Playing For A Contract

Jonathan Willis
August 30 2011 05:11AM

The Toronto Maple Leafs rookie camp, which will kick off in a couple of weeks in advance of their main training camp, features not just draft picks and signed players, but also a bunch of guys playing for a job.

Are any of them of interest as potential future NHL’ers? After the jump, we will look at each.

Garrett Clarke - Clarke, whose describes himself as having “the most durable suitcase in the CHL,” is just about as famous as an undrafted defenseman can be. He ruffled feathers when he backed out of a commitment to the Fargo Force/University of North Dakota to play in the ‘Q’ after being drafted sixth overall in that league’s entry draft. He’s played for four teams in three seasons – including an ugly trade from Halifax that featured plenty of intrigue and hurt feelings.

Skill-wise, Clarke has a lot to offer. He’s a super-pest, capable of driving opponents (and unfortunately, teammates) mad, and he adds a willingness to fight and offensive talent to the mix. The issues here revolve around his penchant for taking bad penalties, and the fact that he can’t seem to avoid off-ice drama no matter where he goes. He’s a boom-or-bust style invitation, and the Leafs’ willingness to gamble on him could pay off.

Dave Cowan - If Cowan’s name seems familiar, it should: he played at the Leafs’ rookie camp last season. He’s also surprisingly long in the tooth for a prospect – he’ll turn 26 in December. Unfortunately, the 6’4” rearguard didn’t get a full opportunity last season, as he took a hit in a rookie match against Pittsburgh and suffered a dislocated shoulder. He’s a defensive defenseman who has spent his last four healthy seasons at Robert Morris University but missed all of last year. He has a contract with Toronto’s ECHL affiliate.

Mitchell Heard - Heard is probably the highest profile unsigned player at this year’s rookie camp, thanks to an offensive explosion at the Leafs’ rookie tournament earlier this summer. He’s slipped through the Entry Draft twice now, but has some offensive ability and put up decent numbers despite not getting any power play time.

Kyle Neuber - 16 games into his professional career, Neuber already finds himself with his third NHL organization. He was drafted as an overage player by Columbus in 2009, and had attended Canucks’ training camp in 2008. He’s an enforcer who barely played last season due to injuries, and that’s the only role he’ll ever fill: he had 31 points in 199 OHL games.

Mike Schwindt - Another defensive defenseman, Schwindt’s offensive upside is extremely limited: in three OHL seasons he has just a single goal. He’s 6’4” and plays a physical game, but he has also passed through the NHL Entry Draft twice already.

Matt Stanisz - It’s really hard not to pull for Stanisz. He’s not a goon, and he’s not even a particularly punishing hitter. As Brock Otten of OHL Prospects tells us, he’s something else entirely:

Stanisz isn't the biggest (about 6'1, 200lbs), nor is he the most physical defender, but he's quietly effective in his own end. He makes the smart play, keeps things simple and has been a highly positive (+/-) defender the past three seasons. This year, his offensive game was taken to that next level where he finished in the top 10 of defenseman scoring.

Otten also lists Stanisz as one of his top-10 overagers worth signing to an NHL contract.

Dennis Urban - Small, offensive defenseman came within two points of leading Robert Morris University in scoring last season. He finished second on the club (including among forwards) in points and shots, as well as first in assists and plus/minus. Remarkably, two-thirds of his points came at even-strength. He followed that performance up with nine points in 14 games with Toronto’s ECHL affiliate and he’s clearly a guy with offensive upside even at the professional level.

It’s a really strong group of undrafted players, further evidence of Toronto’s ability to attract this sort of player. Naturally, the odds are against each of them, but there is enough talent in the group that it bears watching.

For another take on this group, please see Leafs Prospects.

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#1 mayorpoop
August 30 2011, 09:15AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I am an Oilers fan and have nothing of value to offer.

Avatar
#2 Danny Gray
August 30 2011, 09:57AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

This is the second article this week that has illustrated the benefits of ownership with deep pockets. Despite their struggles players are still willing to sign with the Leafs for the chance to either learn from Allaire, or be part of the re-build. Burke has done a nice job spending money outside the Cap.

Avatar
#3 Kent Wilson
August 30 2011, 11:14AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Mitchell Heard? Never heard of him.

I'll show myself out.

Avatar
#4 mayorpoop
August 30 2011, 12:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@mayorpoop

I wish I commented as well as Kent Wilson.

Avatar
#5 kidkawartha
August 30 2011, 01:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

If that Urban kid makes the cut, can we nickname him "Horse-famous"? http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0881631/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89omer

Avatar
#6 mayorpoop
August 30 2011, 03:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I am not able to discern the difference between 'satirical' and just plain obnoxious.

Avatar
#7 Pension Plan Puppets
August 30 2011, 07:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I hope that the Leafs at the very least find a couple out of this crew that can either play for Reading or the Marlies.

Avatar
#8 mayorpoop
August 31 2011, 06:09AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I know you don't care if Oilers fans stop polluting your comments section so I'll let sleeping dogs lie and either comment more appropriately or stop commenting and reading.

Avatar
#9 mayorpoop
August 31 2011, 09:39AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

ok. there is a way to deal with things and your way, editing. first time i have ever posted another site and no i wasn't being obnoxious (apparently that is your take on it tho). i was making light of the craziness on ON compared to LN.

i seen others from other sites come to ON and "pollute" the comment section there and apparently, in my eyes, you have decided to use me as your personal example today and yesterday.

i like the nation sites and i have never written maliciously or obnoxiously before so i'm not sure what reason i would start that now.

you have a problem tell me in with your own words and i will accept and eat crow if called for but to use edit as a means of correction is weak and lacking pr skills.

if i'm wrong i'm not too big to admit it and i apologize for writing something "of no value" on said site. learn to deal with these issues better.

Avatar
#10 mayorpoop
August 31 2011, 09:40AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

by the way if you have name use it and stop hiding behind mine.

Avatar
#11 Pension Plan Puppets
August 31 2011, 10:31AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@mayorpoop

I'm just busting your balls now. The first comment you posted was completely useless and added nothing to the conversation.

Instead of coming in and writing "HARF HARF LAFFS PROSPECTZ GUNNA SUK" you could have written something along the lines of "it's interesting to see these kinds of players get a shot but based on how pervasive scouting of the NA junior leagues is what are the odds that any of these kids make an AHL or ECHL roster let alone an NHL one".

In that case you'd be making your original point (which is absolutely true) that these guys are basically scrapping the bottom of the barrel without being obnoxious.

With regard to the PR skills, fair enough but unfortunately, this platform doesn't allow me the same subtle tools that SBN's does in terms of letting commenters know when they're overstepping their bounds. This approach was funny for me and frustrating for you which worked out perfectly.

I'd rather have fewer quality remarks (yes, even rimshot jokes like Kent's) than more "FIST" remarks and their ilk and I've found that editing comments makes it pretty clear to the commenter that if they are going to comment here that their current approach isn't appreciated. So far it's worked as every commenter that has been hellbent on trolling has not returned to bother us. Maybe you'll be the first to reform their ways in which case you're more than welcome. Or maybe you won't. Either way, there's your explanation.

Avatar
#12 mayorpoop
August 31 2011, 11:04AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

thank you for the response. i will contribute to the site more appropriately in the future.

everyone has to be called a troll at least once i suppose and this was my time.

i wish we could have cleared that up sooner.

in my mind at least all the players jw mentioned are at least a very very cheap gamble.

why play the dollar slots when you can play the nickel.

i'd lke to say i wish the leafs good luck but i am afraid i will spontaneously burst in flames if i do, so i will just wish the above players good luck on their journey.

Avatar
#13 Pension Plan Puppets
August 31 2011, 11:26AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@mayorpoop

I understand, if Oilers fans started wishing Leafs fans good luck then that's on the slippery slope towards wishing Flames fans luck and personally I won't stand for that.

Comments are closed for this article.