Yeah, The Maple Leafs Aren’t As Bad As Columbus

Jonathan Willis
March 19 2012 12:26PM

According to the Toronto Star this morning, the Maple Leafs are virtually the same team as the Columbus Blue Jackets. Sports reporters Mark Zwolinski and Bob Mitchell did a “top to bottom” assessment of both teams and concluded that the Leafs “are on par with” the Blue Jackets.

I’m afraid it wasn’t an assessment well-grounded in the facts.

To summarize the Star’s findings, the Leafs have better forwards and better prospects than Columbus. The Blue Jackets have a better defense and better goaltending; therefore the two teams are on par.

Of course, there’s one big, gaping logical hole in the argument: if the two teams are on par, with the Blue Jackets holding the edge in two of the three categories that matter this season (as “prospects” don’t typically tend to have a major influence in the here-and-now) then why on Earth is Toronto 19 points up in the standings and ahead by 54 goals in terms of goal differential?

The writers at the Star recognize the massive gap. They say, “the Leafs hold a comfortable edge this season.” Then they go on to explain that the Blue Jackets are better in two of the three areas that matter this season. How do they reconcile that dichotomy? I have no idea.

In any event, they’re dead wrong on a lot of things. Sure, Toronto’s James Reimer hasn’t had a great season, but a few good games for the perpetually disappointing Steve Mason and the presence of THE Curtis Sanford doesn’t really give the Blue Jackets a major advantage in the goaltending department. Personally, given a choice between Sanford, Mason, Reimer, and Gustavsson I’d pick Reimer and I don’t think I’d have a second choice.

Then there’s their take on Jack Johnson, who might be the most overrated player in the NHL (and is certainly more overrated than Dion Phaneuf, who currently gets mentioned a lot in that category. I took a hard look at Johnson last month when the trade rumours first surfaced – he’s terrible defensively and doesn’t do enough offensively to make up for it. Sure, he’s had a nice dozen games with Columbus, but there’s years of data to back up my viewpoint.

Also amusing: Mike Komisarek (622 minutes played this season, seventh-most on the team) is mentioned as a “key member of the blue-line, while Carl Gunnarsson (1501 minutes played this season, second-most on the team) isn’t. But I digress.

This was a sloppy and superficial comparison. A simple glance at the standings or goal differential should have woken the writers of the piece up to the fact that what they were writing had little to no grounding in reality. Instead, they put it off to one side and trudged ahead gleefully into flagellating the Leafs.

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#1 A. Bates
March 19 2012, 03:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

James Reimer ES Sv % - .922 Jonas Gustavsson ES Sv % - .909

Steve Mason ES Sv % - .912 Curtis Sanford ES Sv % - .923

CBJ are getting better goaltending at even strength this year but with a healthy Reimer, he's leading this group of goalies easily.

The Star are getting crazier and crazier every day. You could fill ten blogs disputing the outlandish things they say.

Avatar
#2 Matt Stephen
March 19 2012, 04:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

If you need any more evidence of Toronto Star lunacy, just read Damien Cox.

Comments are closed for this article.