SHOULD POILE MATCH?

Jason Gregor
July 19 2012 01:02PM

Shea Weber is smiling knowing that he will make $110 million for the remainder of his NHL career. That's some pretty sweet financial security for Weber, but I wonder what Preds' GM David Poile is thinking right now?

Does he match or take four first-round picks?

Some of the initial response is that the Preds have to match and that this could be a significant turning point for the franchise.

They match and secure their cornerstone D-man for the next 11 years (he won't play the final three years making only $1 million a year) and make it clear they won't lose stars to big markets.

This isn't just about money; it is about whether the Preds want to tell their fans they will compete. I don't like this message, but that's how it is, and every fan base not cheering for a major market team better hope the new CBA outlaws these types of deals in the next CBA.

That Flyers offer sheet appears legal under the existing CBA, and Weber will cash cheques from either Philadelphia or Nashville. Nick Kypreos reported that it pays $14 million per season for the first four years ($1 million in salary and a mind-blowing $13 million in signing bonus.)

That means Weber is due $27 million over the next twelve month, and the Flyers are hoping the small-market Preds aren't financially willing to pay that, and instead they will settle for the four first rounders.

The remaining 10 years of the deal breakdown like this, according to Kypreos.

Years 5 and 6: $12 million/year
Years 7-10:      $6 million/year
Year 11:            $3 million
Years 12-14     $1 million/year

CAN THE PREDS MATCH

The first question Poile has to be asking himself is if Weber is worth a $7.86 million cap hit?

The 14-year, $110 million offer sheet from the Flyers won't hurt the Preds cap wise, but the first six years of the deal are a huge blow to their internal budget.

Can the Predators afford to pay Weber $80 million for the first six years?

Only the owners can answer that.

But what about Weber's worth as a player.

Ken Holland never hid the fact that Nick Lidstrom made his job as GM easier. On most nights he had the best player on the ice, and he was playing 25-27 minutes a night. Sure the Wings had loads of offensive talent, but the one constant for the past two decades was Lidstrom.

Weber is widely considered the best D-man in the game right now. He's physical, he's mean, he can run a PP, he produces points and he'll play against the opposition's best players.

Last year when he was making $7.5 million not one person said he was overvalued. ( I don't say overpaid, because everyone making that much to play hockey is overpaid).

The 2012/2013 cap is currently at $70.2 million.

In 2012 the cap was $64.3 million.
In 2011 it was $59.4 million.
In 2010 it was $56.8 million.
In 2009 it was $56.7 million.

Weber isn't in Lidstrom's category, but he isn't far off. Lidstrom had a much better offensive supporting cast during his tenure in Detroit than Weber has ever had in Nashville.

In 2009 and 2010 Lidstrom made $7.45 million, and he was 13.1% of the Wing's cap. In 2011 he made $6.2 million, 10.4% of the cap and last year his $6.2 salary was 9.6% of the total cap.

Weber turns 27 in August and it safe to say he should have at least five or six year left of being an elite D-man.

His $7.86 cap hit will be 11.1% of this year's cap. Not an awful % when you consider how much he plays.

The challenge for Poile and the Pred's owners will be absorbing the large signing bonus. Do they have the money to pay him, and then will they have the money to surround him with some good offensive stars?

Currently the Preds are $14 million under the cap floor, so they will need to sign Weber and still add another $6.2 million to get to the floor for next year.

They have Pekka Rinne signed for next six years, and if they keep Weber they will have a guaranteed #1 D-man for the same time period, however, the Preds have never developed any legitimate skilled forwards. Signing Weber keeps them at status quo on the ice, but will his contract limit them from improving?

OPTIONS

  1. Walk away and take the four first rounders, which will likely be in the 22-30 range every year.
     
  2. Match it, tell your fans you will compete, and be willing to spend more to find some offensive players.
     
  3. Try to facilitate a trade with the Flyers in the next seven days. (This trade would officially occur after Weber was officially Philly property)

I think option 2 and 3 are their best bets. The four late first rounders won't pay off for at least seven years, if ever.

If they try and deal with the Flyers, they might be able to get some pieces that help right away and a few future picks.

Keep in mind that Poile was the GM of the Washington Capitals in 1990 when the St. Louis Blues offered Scott Stevens a four-year deal worth a combined $5.1 million. The caps didn't match the offer and settled for two first rounders, which could turn into five first rounders if the Caps didn't have a top-seven pick in 1991 or 1992.

The Caps ended up with five first-rounders: Trevor Halverson (21st, 1991), Sergei Gonchar (14th, 1992), Brendan Witt (11th, 1993), Alexander Kharlamov (15th, 1994) and Mika Elomo (23rd, 1995). It is clear they didn't win the deal, despite having five 1st round selections.

I don't see how Poile walks away and takes the four first rounders. He will either trade with the Flyers or pay Weber.

Reports are the Preds were asking for Sean Couturier, Brayden Schenn and something else prior to the Flyers offer sheet. I doubt they get that deal now, but they might get Couturier and Voracek.

I'd keep Weber and hope your scouting staff can find some young forwards.

It's a tough decision either way, but based on this comment I'm guessing the Preds best option will be a trade.

Weber's agent Jarret Bousquet said this regarding the Flyers offer sheet,  "I don't think you would sign an offer sheet unless you were hoping to go to that team."

Ddf3e2ba09069c465299f3c416e43eae
One of Canada's most versatile sports personalities. Jason hosts The Jason Gregor Show, weekdays from 2 to 6 p.m., on TSN 1260, and he writes a column every Monday in the Edmonton Journal. You can follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/JasonGregor
Avatar
#1 Jason
July 19 2012, 01:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Can you highlight how/where the NHL is increasing revenue so quickly? TV? Ticket sales? Merchandise? That's an impressive growth during a economic downturn. I know people say it's Canadian teams, but it can't be them alone.

Avatar
#2 Gret99zky
July 19 2012, 01:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Weber signing the offer sheet is a nice **** you to the Preds. Otherwise he would work with the team rather than back it into a corner.

Next he will ask for a trade after the first year of the deal.

Avatar
#4 freeze
July 19 2012, 01:32PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I'd match it for sure, provided ownership will put up the money. Tough spot for them, if Weber goes the team will be a shadow of its former self, which will decrease attendance and cost the group a ton of cash. They are screwed either way. You'd have to think there would be locker room issues because it seems obvious that Weber wants out. Can't trade him for a year, so 1 year of Weber is mighty pricey.

Avatar
#5 Shapeman
July 19 2012, 01:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

How can Nashville still have the opportunity to trade Weber when he had already signed an offer sheet? Are people suggesting that the two GM's negotiate a trade on the side to properly compensate Poile? How can Weber still be part of a deal... This is confusing me.

Avatar
#6 Tim in Kelowna
July 19 2012, 01:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Poile is in a tough spot. I feel bad for him because he could have almost certainly recieved a better return from one of the trades he was working on. If the Preds have the cash to pay for the first four years then they absolutely have to match, because:

1) There isn't a better defensemen out there. 2) Those picks will be almost worthless, given that Philly will be a Presidents trophy contender for each of those 4 years. 3) The cap hit is about right for a player of Weber's calibre. 4) Having Rinne and Weber in your lineup ensures you are competitive for years to come.

Gregor, does this set the bar for a guy like Pieterangelo?

Avatar
#7 RossCreekNation
July 19 2012, 01:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Shapeman wrote:

How can Nashville still have the opportunity to trade Weber when he had already signed an offer sheet? Are people suggesting that the two GM's negotiate a trade on the side to properly compensate Poile? How can Weber still be part of a deal... This is confusing me.

Simple. NSH threatens to match the offer sheet unless PHI can sweeten the deal with players - NSH trades some/all of the 1st's back for actual players. Remember how Oil got Cujo?

Avatar
#8 The Beaker
July 19 2012, 01:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Shapeman wrote:

How can Nashville still have the opportunity to trade Weber when he had already signed an offer sheet? Are people suggesting that the two GM's negotiate a trade on the side to properly compensate Poile? How can Weber still be part of a deal... This is confusing me.

It would be a "we will match unless you make a deal to trade back these 1st rounders for _____________" deal.

Avatar
#9 gongshow
July 19 2012, 01:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Something smells fishy about this deal.

If the cap hit is $300,000 less per year, the Flyers only have to give up 2 first rounders along with a second and a third. Is this Weber's way of forcing Poile's hand to keep him yet not totally screw his old team over if the Preds feel that the contract is too much to swallow? Why wouldn't Holmgren find a way to keep the deal under $7.3 M cap hit and save his own team a couple of first round draft picks? Why wouldn't Weber who is likely going to be with Philly for a looking time take a small decrease to help his potential new team stay competitive in coming years?

Something about this deal just seems off.

Avatar
#10 The Beaker
July 19 2012, 01:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
gongshow wrote:

Something smells fishy about this deal.

If the cap hit is $300,000 less per year, the Flyers only have to give up 2 first rounders along with a second and a third. Is this Weber's way of forcing Poile's hand to keep him yet not totally screw his old team over if the Preds feel that the contract is too much to swallow? Why wouldn't Holmgren find a way to keep the deal under $7.3 M cap hit and save his own team a couple of first round draft picks? Why wouldn't Weber who is likely going to be with Philly for a looking time take a small decrease to help his potential new team stay competitive in coming years?

Something about this deal just seems off.

because Philly wants Weber and 300k and 2 better picks seems worth it to them. They don't want Nashville to match. That isnt really hard to understand.

Avatar
#11 BingBong
July 19 2012, 01:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Man, Preds are in a tough spot here.

Gregor, when looking at your option #2 (Preds keep Weber for remainder of contract and build around him) what's to stop him from pulling a Pronger after the first year? It seems obvious he wants out, especially considering what his agent said.

It seems to me the only option Poile has is #3; to try and get the best return he possibly can.

Avatar
#12 KatzKidsJewFro
July 19 2012, 01:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

So, what are the rules regarding Nashville's ability to trade Shea to a team other than Philly? Is it possible for them to trade him to a different team, where they would match the offer sheet?

Avatar
#13 Archaeologuy
July 19 2012, 02:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

If they have the 27 million dollars to pay, most of it lump sum, then they have to match. 4 1st round picks is nothing when they will likely be in the 22 or higher range. Those Eberle's that are available that low come few and far between a lot more misses.

They only need to concern themselves with the first 27 million because after they've paid that they could trade Weber no problem for more return than 4 junk picks in the draft.

If money is no object then naturally you just match the offer and call it a victory that you signed Weber to a lifetime contract (barring his eventual trade demands).

It's going to cost them 27 million dollars and 1 years time to trade him for something actually valuable. I say do it, but who knows how close to broke those guys run.

Avatar
#14 RossCreekNation
July 19 2012, 02:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
gongshow wrote:

Something smells fishy about this deal.

If the cap hit is $300,000 less per year, the Flyers only have to give up 2 first rounders along with a second and a third. Is this Weber's way of forcing Poile's hand to keep him yet not totally screw his old team over if the Preds feel that the contract is too much to swallow? Why wouldn't Holmgren find a way to keep the deal under $7.3 M cap hit and save his own team a couple of first round draft picks? Why wouldn't Weber who is likely going to be with Philly for a looking time take a small decrease to help his potential new team stay competitive in coming years?

Something about this deal just seems off.

Offersheet compensation is based on the total $ ($110M) divided by 5 yrs for deals longer than 5yrs, essentially making Weber's cap hit $22M for compensation purposes.

Avatar
#15 justDOit
July 19 2012, 02:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I think the players are smelling the coming CBA, with a lower cap due to the revised definition of 'hockey related revenue' and a smaller piece of the pie.

So if Weber gets $27M over the next 12 months, and the cap goes down by $8M or so next season, he will cough up a lot of money to escrow payments. And if there's no hockey next year, he still gets a pretty nice payday.

Avatar
#16 Rob
July 19 2012, 02:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
gongshow wrote:

Something smells fishy about this deal.

If the cap hit is $300,000 less per year, the Flyers only have to give up 2 first rounders along with a second and a third. Is this Weber's way of forcing Poile's hand to keep him yet not totally screw his old team over if the Preds feel that the contract is too much to swallow? Why wouldn't Holmgren find a way to keep the deal under $7.3 M cap hit and save his own team a couple of first round draft picks? Why wouldn't Weber who is likely going to be with Philly for a looking time take a small decrease to help his potential new team stay competitive in coming years?

Something about this deal just seems off.

Keeping the cap hit under $7.3 M doesn't change the compensation from 4 first rounders. For the purposes of determining compensation, they use a maximum term of 5 years to calculate the AAV of the contract.

Avatar
#17 RossCreekNation
July 19 2012, 02:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

If I'm NSH, I tell PHI we'll match unless they send the.Schenn bros for 3 of their picks back.

Avatar
#18 madjam
July 19 2012, 02:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Take the 4 first rounders . Maybe then league will do something in earnest about these raids that are driving up the price for players , and contracting the market place for lesser clubs to remain viable in smaller markets . I'm surprised Burke has not lashed out at this as yet . Maybe this will be the norm and small markets squeezed out ? They might even form an international alliance and move dwindling small market teams internationally ?

This practice , if it should continue to escalate , could prove disasterous for resignng our youngsters for a decent time and cost !

Avatar
#19 russ99
July 19 2012, 02:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

This is a no brainer, he has to match.

Even if they deal Weber next offseason, any return in a trade is vastly better than 4 mid-20's draft picks that take years to develop.

Plus there's a big difference in public/fan opinion between getting screwed over on an offer sheet than Weber publicly asking for a trade next summer.

Avatar
#20 RossCreekNation
July 19 2012, 02:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
russ99 wrote:

This is a no brainer, he has to match.

Even if they deal Weber next offseason, any return in a trade is vastly better than 4 mid-20's draft picks that take years to develop.

Plus there's a big difference in public/fan opinion between getting screwed over on an offer sheet than Weber publicly asking for a trade next summer.

You think they wanna fork over $27M to Weberin the next 11 1/2 months, and then trade him? That may be more costly than not matching at all. Got to work out a deal with Philly imo. Should be able to get Voracek or Schenn imo.

Avatar
#21 Archaeologuy
July 19 2012, 02:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@RossCreekNation

There is no deal to be had except take the 1st rounders or keep Weber. He has to wait a year before dealing him.

Avatar
#22 Tim in Kelowna
July 19 2012, 02:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@madjam

Any GM that makes a decision that negatively affects your team, just to make a point, should be fired. I'm sure Chuck Fletcher wasn't thrilled about handing out 200 million dollars for Parise and Suter, but his responsibility is to the team not to the game of hockey.

Avatar
#23 TrentonL
July 19 2012, 02:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

What happened last CBA with the rollbacks in terms of signing bonus? Is the deal structured this way so Weber gets most of his dough no matter what rollbacks happen/the Preds have no hope of relief on more than tehe $1 million "salary"? Any CBA nerds out there have an answer?

Avatar
#24 gongshow
July 19 2012, 02:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@RossCreekNation @Rob Thanks - I missed that point.

Avatar
#25 RossCreekNation
July 19 2012, 02:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Archaeologuy wrote:

There is no deal to be had except take the 1st rounders or keep Weber. He has to wait a year before dealing him.

Wrong. How did Oil get Cujo? StL signed Corson. Comp was 2 1st's (I think). Oil & Blues worked out a deal where Oil wouldn't match & Blues would send Cujo & Grier to Oil in return for their picks back.

Same deal here. Threaten PHI you'll match if they don't sweeten the pot.

Avatar
#26 rickithebear
July 19 2012, 02:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

2010-11: Shea weber without Suter. 10 Games played -9 in plus/minus.

Weber has played 6459 min in last 5 yesars.

285 min (4.4%)was a collection of lesser players who played less than 15 minutes a season with him.

He played 5154 Min (80%) with Suter and was a positive player.

The other 15.6%

He played 370 Min (5.7%) with greg Zanon and was a negative player.

He played 318 min (4.9%) with Boullion and was a negative player

He played 201 minutes with Hamhuis(3.1%) and was a negative player.

He played 126 min (1.9%) and was a positive player.

Webber was a negative player 88% of the time without Suter.

That is with some historically good Dmen.

This is what makes me nervous about a suterless weber.

Avatar
#27 John Chambers
July 19 2012, 02:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@ RossCreek

I agree with you. Philadephia may have thought that they were getting better leverage in their negotiation by signing Weber, but in some ways they've done the opposite. If the Flyers really want Weber they'll have to pay Poile's asking price.

That price undoubtedly includes Couturier and Schenn, and possibly even another Schenn.

Avatar
#28 pelhem grenville
July 19 2012, 02:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

"...Shea weber without Suter..."

wow those are very telling stats...here i thought Suter would have gone south without Weber!

...suck it Philly

Avatar
#29 onlyoil
July 19 2012, 03:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@RossCreekNation

Gerry Johansen a player agent was just on Oilers now talking to Bob and he stated that the deal is signed and whatever the compensation is in draft picks, is what Preds will get if they don't match. He can't be traded for one calendar year even to the Flyers.

Avatar
#30 Quicksilver ballet
July 19 2012, 03:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

The Flyers could surrender 6 to 8 first rounders and it still wouldn't be enough compensation for a player like Weber. Flyers are a top ten team for the next 8-10 yrs.

The Predators need to match. Pekka Rinne,Weber and Rick Nash would help differ another step back to square one for what little fanbase there is.

Avatar
#31 RossCreekNation
July 19 2012, 03:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
onlyoil wrote:

Gerry Johansen a player agent was just on Oilers now talking to Bob and he stated that the deal is signed and whatever the compensation is in draft picks, is what Preds will get if they don't match. He can't be traded for one calendar year even to the Flyers.

Semantics. They can't match the offer sheet & then trade him. But they can threaten to match if PHI doesn't take some/all of the picks back for roster players.

Avatar
#32 RossCreekNation
July 19 2012, 03:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props
John Chambers wrote:

@ RossCreek

I agree with you. Philadephia may have thought that they were getting better leverage in their negotiation by signing Weber, but in some ways they've done the opposite. If the Flyers really want Weber they'll have to pay Poile's asking price.

That price undoubtedly includes Couturier and Schenn, and possibly even another Schenn.

Not exactly. If Flyers figured Preds might deal Weber to NYR, they throw out offer sheet & that gives them an exclusive 7 day period to negotiate a deal with Preds. Flyers could very well be willing to give up more than four 1st's, but just guaranteed that they're the only team able to negotiate a trade.

Avatar
#33 NHL93
July 19 2012, 03:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Let him go, take the 4 first rounders.. that's 8 1st rd picks in 4 years. You can move them for actual quality players to fill holes, or use them to draft for the future. Weber is a beast, but that contract will be an anchor around the neck of your team.

Avatar
#34 Michael
July 19 2012, 03:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

The same old 'NHL' inequality, the rich teams structuring deals (legally) to take advantage of the poorer teams. Likely, you take the four first rounder's and walk away. I doubt they have the finances to match the offer. I don't want to move JBO, but if the Preds are willing to send some picks our way for JBo, Feaster will likely take them up on it.

It's beginning to look a bit like the NBA, the superstars only want to play for a handfull of teams. Make's we wonder how a team like Calgary is going to attract a free agent 'star' to eventually replace Iggy?

Avatar
#35 EHH Team
July 19 2012, 03:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

What's the benefit of paying signing bonus of $13M and salary of $1M rather than $14 million salary in each of the first two years? Is it simply that the signing bonus must be paid up front each year and would put the Preds under more financial pressure?

Avatar
#36 John Chambers
July 19 2012, 03:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@RossCreekNation

Good counterpoint.

If Weber goes to the Flyers I bet that it won't be for 4 1st's. Either the Preds match or a deal will get made and my guess is that Schenn and Coururier are part of the deal.

Avatar
#37 EHH Team
July 19 2012, 03:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

In explaining the NHL's rejection of Ilya Kovalchuk's contract, this explanation was given on TSN's website:

"The current collective bargaining agreement states that a player who signs a contract before the age of 35 can retire and have his contract come off a team's salary cap; however, teams must negotiate the contract in question in a good faith effort to have the player remain in the league for the duration of the contract.

The current CBA explains circumvention as the following in section 26.3:

(a) No Club or Club Actor, directly or indirectly, may: (i) enter into any agreements, promises, undertakings, representations, commitments, inducements, assurances of intent, or understandings of any kind, whether express, implied, oral or written, including without limitation, any SPC, Qualifying Offer, Offer Sheet or other transaction, or (ii) take or fail to take any action whatsoever, if either (i) or (ii) is intended to or has the effect of defeating or Circumventing the provisions of this Agreement or the intention of the parties as reflected by the provisions of this Agreement, including without limitation, provisions with respect to the financial and other reporting obligations of the Clubs and the League, Team Payroll Range, Player Compensation Cost Redistribution System, the Entry Level System and/or Free Agency."

With the final three years of the contract being $1M per year when Weber is 38-40 years old, this offer sheet seems almost as questionable as the deal New Jersey was not able to put through. It's hard to fathom Weber playing for $1M per year when he has banked $107M in the prior nine years.

Avatar
#38 BrudnySeaby
July 19 2012, 03:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Well, all this speculation is fun but how it plays out depends on 2 things I guess: - Does Nashville have the money to match? - How is the relationship between Nashville and Weber (does Weber want out regardless of what happens in Nashville)? That will be interesting to watch the next 7 days...

Avatar
#39 RossCreekNation
July 19 2012, 03:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@John Chambers

I doubt they'll get both, and I doubt they'll get Couturier. Schenn maybe. Voracek most likely.

Avatar
#40 Smokey
July 19 2012, 04:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Other then Voracek, what other RFA's does Philly have. Ya gotta think that someone should put a offer sheet in on Voracek. That would make this highly entertaining...

Avatar
#41 Clyde Frog
July 19 2012, 04:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

If the Predator's can't sign due to cashflow issues, I wonder if they would have a legal case that Philly used insider and confidential information in making this pitch.

I always was confused by the amount of disclosure "competitors" were forced into, I imagine with the league revenues needing to be calculated, the amount of information disclosured would be very high.

I do not know how this information is accessed or shared in the league, hence the question.

But if the contract was structured based on information disclosed to the league to ensure Nashville is not in a cash position to match, well it would be fun to watch a lawsuit between ownership groups WHILE they try to negotiate with the NHLPA.

Avatar
#43 Oiler AL
July 19 2012, 05:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

HIgh stakes poker here. But, Philly still needs a goalie.

Avatar
#44 Quicksilver ballet
July 19 2012, 05:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Mathletes in action....

Avatar
#45 John Chambers
July 19 2012, 05:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@EHH Team

These will be interesting in about a decade. What happens when the player is in his late 30's and still wants to play? Lidstrom made over $6M this past year while Selanne just re-upped for $4.5. Players like Weber and maybe even Kovalchuk might stick around and keep playing despite being paid a pittance.

I suppose it won't matter to either of them anyway at that point whether they play for $1M or $5M.

Avatar
#46 Oilcruzer
July 19 2012, 05:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

RossCN wrote:

Wrong. How did Oil get Cujo? StL signed Corson. Comp was 2 1st's (I think). Oil & Blues worked out a deal where Oil wouldn't match & Blues would send Cujo & Grier to Oil in return for their picks back. Same deal here. Threaten PHI you'll match if they don't sweeten the pot

Was the wording of the previous CBA identical?

Avatar
#47 KleptoKlown
July 19 2012, 05:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

No way Polie lets Weber go for only 4 1st rounders. If Weber doesnt want to play in Nashville anymore, he shouldn't have signed this offer sheet. Assuming the Preds ownership has the money, they should match. I could even see a team like the Rangers funneling the money to Nashville just to prevent the Flyers from obtaining Weber.

Even with Weber, Philly won't win a cup with Byrgz in goal.

Avatar
#48 puck-bandit
July 19 2012, 05:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Any way you look at this deal ownership has to be involved for the front money, and do they have that. I would not want to be Poile in this deal, his job could very easily be on the line. On a personal level, if I was him, I would take the picks and do what I could in terms of trade, and the 30mil they have in cap space. If you get one team that makes a stand around these stupid contracts, then just maybe we can get some commonsense back into contracts. Why do teams want to put up all the front money, and with no guarantee that a player may, or may not get injured. Did it work for Buffalo last year? I know he's a great D-Man and should be rewarded with a decent contract, but this is out of control. In 2013 the UFA market is going to be huge, so why not take what you can and do the best you can, and move on. Something is fishy about this whole thing, and I just can't get my mind around it?

Avatar
#49 seanjohn667
July 19 2012, 05:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

does this offersheet signing further drive home the need for Tambo to lock up Eberle and Hall to along term contract ASAP? this may by a golden opportunity to convince the yound studs that they should get something done before the new CBA is in place, as they don't know how the landscape will look. I say Tambo should take this moment of uncertainty to lock the boys up for their entire 20s.

Avatar
#50 RKD
July 19 2012, 05:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

The writing was on the wall for Nashville as far back as last year. With Suter's exit for Minnesota, Weber's impending departure was soon expected.

Nashville management, especially Poile knew this day was coming. It was only a matter of time before these two left.

Suter and Weber want to win a Stanley Cup. It wasn't going to happen with the Preds. Poile didn't do enough to solidify the forward ranks.

It's clear Weber wants out, matching would only keep a disgruntled player in the fold. Philly is closer to winning a cup, the biggest question mark is Bryz.

Hey Poile, what will you offer for Jay Bouwmeester?

Comments are closed for this article.