Lets Talk About David Bolland

Jeff Veillette (Jeffler)
February 25 2014 03:23PM

drizzybolland

When word came out that David Bolland was skating with the team and practicing on the third line, people had reason to be incredibly excited. Bolland, after all is a good hockey player. Specifically, he is better than the players who fill his place during times of injury. As such, this should theoretically make the Leafs a better hockey team as a whole when he is in the lineup.

There was one lingering concern as he recovered from his ankle laceration, however. Were the Leafs going to take the plunge on an extension without a long look at his post-recovery play? After all, this the same team who gave John-Michael Liles a long term deal while still recovering from a pretty serious concussion, and David Bolland is the same player who will now have to play with a special skate for the rest of his life. To make matters worse, they have exactly fifteen games to work with when evaluating his time with the blue and white.

So when months passed with nothing more than whispers, all was good in the world. But with his return imminent, the rumour mill is buzzing yet again. Bob McKenzie was on That's Hockey yesterday, and mentioned that Bolland will be looking for as much as David Clarkson money, but more likely something in the range of 4.5 to 5 million dollars. Some think this is fair, using terms such as "heart and soul of the team" (has played 15 games in Toronto) and "knows how to win" (supporting piece on modern day dynasty). I wanted to see if it was.

EDIT: Sportsnet is now reporting that he is seeking 7-8 years at 5 million per.

Comparables

Whenever a contract extension rumour comes about, I like to use historical precedent to see if see if it makes sense in any way, shape or form. I did this with Carl Gunnarsson, Phil Kessel, and Dion Phaneuf on here, along with Blake Wheeler on JetsNation. So far, it hasn't failed me.

With that said, I did a look for centres who make in between 4.5-5.5 million dollars, were coming up on on unrestricted free agency (RFA's have way less leverage and take lower salaries) before signing, were between 25 and 29 in their contract years, and signed 3+ year deals. I found eight players in the Salary Cap Era. To make it more fun, they all happen to have 5 or 6 year deals, which works considering the whispers of long term commitment. They are as follows:

Player Contract Year Age Contract Inflation
David Bolland 2013/14 27 ? X 5 5
Stephen Weiss 2012/13 29 5 x 4.9 5.42
Valtteri Filppula 2012/13 28 5 x 5 5.53
Brooks Laich 2010/11 27 6 x 4.5 4.98
David Backes 2009/10 25 5 x 4.5 5.39
Tomas Plekanec 2009/10 27 6 x 5 5.99
Shawn Horcoff 2007/08 29 6 x 5.5 6.9
Mike Ribeiro 2007/08 27 5 x 5 6.27
David Legwand 2006/07 26 6 x 4.5 6.36
Mikhail Grabovski 2011/12 28 5 x 5.5 5.571

  • Players who signed their contracts a while back have a steep adjustment for inflation. Unsurprisingly, the $6M+ players also happen to be the best offensive players.
  • Weiss and Filppula are the only two of the bunch to sign to new teams in their contracts, which likely explains the bidding wars that got them both into this class despite their poor contact years.
  • Weiss and Bolland's time missed means I will also use 2012/13 in the tables below. Since Bolland missed time with injuries last year as well, I mixed in his playoff stats for the production and "real time" tables.

Minute Adjustment

To compare these players contract year's more accurately, I adjust everybody's minutes to 1640 over 82 games, which is an average of 20 minutes per game. It's a lot like the "per 60" stats you see on the likes of Extra Skater and Hockey Analysis, but it looks cleaner and gives you a season-based look while still providing the level playing field.

That is more along the lines of a top line centre than it is someone in Bolland's current position on the team, but there's a reason why I stuck with that number in this case.

Ice Time / Zone Starts

First off, it's important to consider the role that these guys all play. Every single player who received a payday in this range played at least a minute and change more than Bolland per game over their contract year, and in the case of everybody other than Filppula and Grabovski, two minutes or more.

Player C-Year Even SH PP Total OZ Start%
David Bolland 2012/13 12:58 0:52 2:28 16:20 49.6
David Bolland 2012/13 P 12:25 0:16 0:49 13:30 33.6
David Bolland 2013/14 13:31 1:49 0:53 16:15 37.9
Stephen Weiss 2011/12 15:57 1:15 3:17 20:30 55.6
Stephen Weiss 2012/13 14:14 1:45 2:28 18:27 57.4
Valtteri Filppula 2012/13 14:26 0:36 2:43 17:46 58.9
Brooks Laich 2010/11 13:07 2:18 2:59 18:25 53.5
David Backes 2009/10 13:28 2:18 2:31 18:18 47.2
Tomas Plekanec 2009/10 14:35 2:44 2:38 19:57 44.3
Shawn Horcoff 2007/08 15:15 2:47 4:10 22:13 46.3
Mike Ribeiro 2007/08 14:04 0:01 4:20 18:25 70.6
David Legwand 2006/07 13:46 2:33 2:01 18:21 ??
Mikhail Grabovski 2011/12 15:13 0:17 2:05 17:36 53

A key contributor to this is special teams usage. Bolland has played less than three minutes a game in non-ES situations, most of it being on the penalty kill (where he was used much more sparingly in Chicago). He's the only player to not play two minutes on one (if not both) of the two units a night. Not everybody can be vintage Shawn Horcoff (6:57 combined!), but he comes off as less essential to his team's core in this situation.

As well, Bolland's usage is much less offensive zone based this season and in last years playoffs. Rarely do you commit so heavily to a produce who spends so much time away from a scoring opportunity, and rarely does that player produce at a solid level for more than a short burst. Usage was one of the reasons many were skeptical of the on-the-list Grabovski's buyout last season. Having an guy in your bottom six who integrates both shutdown and offensive elements into his game is great, but this salary range is historically and sensibly for offense-oriented players who eat up ice time in all situations.

Bolland hasn't been one of those in the NHL, and after failing to excel when placed with Patrick Kane and a mixture of Patrick Sharp and other wingers, fell further down Chicago's minutes chart. If it happens in Toronto, it'll likely be a forced attempt with a low probability of success.

Production

So, as I mentioned in the previous section, Bolland doesn't get a lot of time to produce. But if we adjusted everybody's totals, how would he fare?

Player C-Year GP G A PTS PM PIM S S% TOI
David Bolland 2012/13 53 10 10 20 -9 46 75 13.3 815
David Bolland 2013/14 15 6 4 10 4 18 27 22.2 244
Stephen Weiss 2011/12 80 20 37 57 5 60 149 13.4 1641
Stephen Weiss 2012/13 17 1 3 4 -13 25 19 5.3 314
Valtteri Filppula 2012/13 41 9 8 17 -4 6 78 11.5 729
Brooks Laich 2010/11 82 16 32 48 14 26 207 7.7 1511
David Backes 2009/10 79 17 31 48 -4 106 163 10.4 1446
Tomas Plekanec 2009/10 82 25 45 70 5 50 216 11.6 1637
Shawn Horcoff 2007/08 53 21 29 50 7 39 115 18.3 1178
Mike Ribeiro 2007/08 76 27 56 83 21 66 107 25.2 1400
David Legwand 2006/07 78 27 36 63 24 44 153 17.6 1432
Mikhail Grabovski 2011/12 74 23 28 51 0 51 239 9.6 1303

Player C-Year GP G A PTS PM PIM S S% TOI
David Bolland 2012/13 82 20 20 40 -18 92 150 13.3 1640
David Bolland 2013/14 82 40 26 66 26 121 181 22.2 1640
Stephen Weiss 2011/12 82 20 36 56 4 59 148 13.4 1640
Stephen Weiss 2012/13 82 5 15 20 -67 130 99 5.3 1640
Valtteri Filppula 2012/13 82 20 18 38 -9 13 175 11.5 1640
Brooks Laich 2010/11 82 17 34 51 15 28 224 7.7 1640
David Backes 2009/10 82 19 35 54 -4 120 184 10.4 1640
Tomas Plekanec 2009/10 82 25 45 70 5 50 216 11.6 1640
Shawn Horcoff 2007/08 82 29 40 69 9 54 160 18.3 1640
Mike Ribeiro 2007/08 82 31 65 96 24 77 125 25.2 1640
David Legwand 2006/07 82 30 41 71 27 50 175 17.6 1640
Mikhail Grabovski 2011/12 82 28 35 63 0 64 300 9.6 1640

As it turns out, even while playing 92% of his even strength minutes with Patrick Kane last year's Bolland doesn't turn out so hot compared to his peers. He shoots less than a lot of them, hits the back of the net a little more, and as such keeps up in terms of goal scoring, but his assist numbers trail everybody but a broken Weiss and a struggling Filppula (who had much better numbers in the previous year, and has performed well through 56 games this year).

This year's Bolland is slightly in most regards, except for plus/minus (irrelevant but included just because), and goals. The goals, of course, are up because of a crazy 22.2% shooting percentage, the highest of his career. With a pace of 181 shots, it's not like he's pulling a Tyler Bozak and only shooting when he thinks he has an easy goal, either. Either he has learned how to be the best sniper of our generation, or he's getting lucky. I'll go with the latter; Ribeiro scored 27 in his contract year and hasn't hit 20 since, despite continuing to be a very good playmaker.

Unless you're absolutely desperate, I'd want at least a 50-55 point pace from a $5M centre, in a way that looks sustainable. This is really Bolland's first go at the first part, while lacking the second. This is a concern to me.

Real-Time Stats

Also known as "pretty much the worst things ever", Real Time Statistics are stats that are often brought up to boost up role players, despite their subjective nature. Some arenas are better at counting giveaways. Some arenas consider a slight brushing a hit. They're very unpredictable, but a large difference between players could be worth noting at times. Here's what they show in Bolland's case:

Player C-Year Age FOW FOL FOW% Hits BkS GV TK TOI
David Bolland 2012/13 26 324 394 45.1 74 21 24 30 815
David Bolland 2013/14 27 104 148 41.2 26 9 6 9 244
Stephen Weiss 2011/12 28 781 688 53.1 92 61 33 56 1641
Stephen Weiss 2012/13 29 141 135 51.1 6 10 2 13 314
Valtteri Filppula 2012/13 28 179 144 55.4 16 12 19 18 729
Brooks Laich 2010/11 27 269 255 51.3 113 54 32 38 1511
David Backes 2009/10 25 504 561 47.3 266 60 21 40 1446
Tomas Plekanec 2009/10 27 791 824 48.9 51 63 58 46 1637
Shawn Horcoff 2007/08 29 487 476 50.6 15 30 31 28 1178
Mike Ribeiro 2007/08 27 397 486 44.9 53 23 88 43 1400
David Legwand 2006/07 26 502 606 45.3 15 43 45 54 1432
Mikhail Grabovski 2011/12 28 466 439 51.5 56 32 45 49 1303

Player C-Year Age FOW FOL FOW% Hits BkS GV TK TOI
David Bolland 2012/13 26 652 793 45.1 149 42 48 60 1640
David Bolland 2013/14 27 699 995 41.2 175 60 40 60 1640
Stephen Weiss 2011/12 28 781 688 53.1 92 61 33 56 1640
Stephen Weiss 2012/13 29 736 705 51.1 31 52 10 68 1640
Valtteri Filppula 2012/13 28 403 324 55.4 36 27 43 40 1640
Brooks Laich 2010/11 27 292 277 51.3 123 59 35 41 1640
David Backes 2009/10 25 572 636 47.3 302 68 24 45 1640
Tomas Plekanec 2009/10 27 792 826 48.9 51 63 58 46 1640
Shawn Horcoff 2007/08 29 678 663 50.6 21 42 43 39 1640
Mike Ribeiro 2007/08 27 465 569 44.9 62 27 103 50 1640
David Legwand 2006/07 26 575 694 45.3 17 49 52 62 1640
Mikhail Grabovski 2011/12 28 587 553 51.5 70 40 57 62 1640

There's a lean towards being at least decent at the draw, but a few of these players had weak years, so I won't consider it an essential. I don't even know if I consider being good at faceoffs an essential in any centre; a nice touch, but not significant enough in changing the course long-term to care. That said, Bolland will never be confused for Yanic Perreault and is probably the worst at it on this list.

Bolland's hit numbers seem to be higher than everybody elses in both uniforms, and his shot block totals are pretty pedestrian. There's debate over if giveaways and takeaways are as bad and good as they sound (since taking away the puck means you didn't have it), but you can see that he's at least instigating changes in possession a lot when you add the two up.

Basically, the only thing here that really shines for him is throwing the body around, which sounds like the same reason the Leafs were interested in David Clarkson, so I don't know how much I'd be bragging about that.

Durability

None of these "over 82 games" stats matter if Bolland can't get close to 82 games. Sure enough, he's missed 20 games (or equivalent in the case of 2013) in five of seven seasons, and that's pretty concerning. Just look at his injury history:

Date Injury
11/4/2013 Left ankle injury, injured reserve. (45+ Games)
4/24/2013 Groin, day-to-day. (8 Games)
4/6/2013 Foot injury, day-to-day. (4 Games)
2/24/2013 Upper body injury, day-to-day. (5 Games)
2/2/2013 Right leg injury, day-to-day. (1 Game)
4/5/2012 Upper body injury, day-to-day. (2 Games)
11/10/2011 Foot injury, day-to-day. (3 Games)
10/7/2011 Upper body injury, day-to-day. (1 Game)
3/26/2011 Concussion, sidelined indefinitely. (17 Games)
12/13/2010 Upper body injury, day-to-day. (1 Game)
10/30/2010 Rib injury, day-to-day. (4 Games)
3/25/2010 Flu, day-to-day. (1 Game)
11/6/2009 Back injury, day-to-day. (41 Games)
10/7/2009 Back injury, day-to-day. (1 Game)
4/1/2009 Foot injury, day-to-day. (1 Game)
3/2/2008 Hip flexor, day-to-day. (1 Game)
12/26/2007 Broken finger, sidelined indefinitely. (15 Games)

That's pretty concerning, if you ask me. There are five separate injuries that caused missed time in 2013 alone, to go with one in 2012, two in 2011, two and a flu in 2010, three in 2009, and one each in 2008 and 2007. He's hurt his feet multiple times, his right leg once, and now has a severe, life altering injury involving his left ankle.

Here's a chart of percentage of games played by our subjects in the three years prior to signing, and years after (if applicable).

3Y Prior 2Y Prior C-Year Year After 2Y After 3Y After
Bolland 92.7 73 25      
Weiss 92.7 97.5 35.4 44.8    
Filppula 86.6 98.8 85.4 96.5    
Laich 100 95 100 100 18.8 74.6
Backes 87.8 100 96.3 100 100 100
Plekanec 98.8 97.5 100 93.9 98.8 97.9
Horcoff 96.3 97.5 64.6 97.5 93.9 57.3
Ribeiro 96.3 100 92.7 100 80.5 100
Legwand 100 53.7 95 79.2 89.1 100
Grabovski 72 98.8 90.2 100 83.1

With the exception of Weiss (signed by a desperate Detroit on an open market) and Horcoff (who was a glaring mistake of a signing by the Oilers), everybody in this range stayed largely healthy going into their deals, particularly in their contract years. Those guys have stayed relatively consistent to their past, including Weiss continuing to struggle this year and Horcoff's knee once again failing on him a few years later.

Where Are They Now?

  • Stephen Weiss looks like a disaster in Detroit, scoring just four points in 26 games. His contract is only better than David Clarkson's based on length.
  • Valtteri Filppula has rebounded from a bad year with the Red Wings and looks to be doing well as Tampa Bay's temporary number one centre while Steven Stamkos recovers from his leg injury. That said, I'd expect his numbers to slip once the goal scoring phenom returns.
  • Brooks Laich hasn't scored more than 41 points since being signed, and missed most of last season. He's on pace for less than 20 points this year.
  • David Backes scored 62 points in the following year, and that remains his career high, though he's still a core member of the St. Louis Blues who hasn't missed a game since day 1 of his new contract.
  • After scoring 70, Tomas Plekanec hasn't hit 60 points since. In fact, he now looks to be a 50 point guy, likely to fall down the depth chart as Alex Galchenyuk develops and David Desharnais, well, exists.
  • Shawn Horcoff hasn't scored 40 points since 2008/09 and was dumped by the Edmonton Oilers last season.
  • Mike Ribeiro finished off his contract as a consistent 60-70 point guy, but never shot at close to 25% ever again. Overall, I think he was the biggest success of this bunch, but when you consider cap inflation, that isn't surprising.
  • David Legwand's 63 point year was his first and last above 55, though he's looked pretty solid this season. No matter what the case, he's Nashville's first ever draft pick and I don't think they're losing sleep at him making a bit too much in the first few years.
  • Mikhail Grabovski was essentially run out of town by means of questionable usage by the Toronto Maple Leafs, who used their compliance buyout on him after just one season. He signed with the Washington Capitals on a 1 year deal and has produced at about the same pace as he was when he played for Toronto.

Overall, most of these turned into bad signings, though hey, two worked out alright, and Filppula might too.

What's Your Point?

So, those are the numbers. David Bolland, for all intents and purposes, is not a centre that you commit $5 million to long term. He hasn't produced enough on a long term basis, doesn't play enough, doesn't do as many of the overrated "little things" as you think he does, and is terribly unhealthy.

Does this mean that I want Bolland gone as soon as possible? Absolutely not. Beyond the fact that I'm curious to see how he plays when he returns (which should be this week), he was a very effective super third liner for this team. He's been a more physical, less face-offy version what I was claiming Tyler Bozak could be to many teams in the summer, though he's still doing his thing on the top line. Plus he's a local boy, and while I think that has absolutely nothing to do with a team's success, I still think it's cool to see a player live out his dreams.

I also don't think it's worth shopping him at the trade deadline. Whether you feel the Leafs are in a good long term position to compete for the Stanley Cup or not, they're definitely in the playoff picture. If this is his only year here, I'd rather see him play it out and help the team secure a playoff spot and do their best once there than take a few scraps in exchange for making an opponent better. His value is higher with Toronto than it is elsewhere until it becomes time to talk contract.

In an ideal world, I'd be content with signing Bolland for what he's making now for no more than three years, and giving him a raise if he'll take a single year. It makes things complicated with Peter Holland waiting to return to the team, but would be solid from an asset management perspective with limited chance to blow up in Toronto's face.

But long term? I'm not sold. The "Medium 3" of Bozak, Kadri, and Bolland will add up to too much money to not have a top-end talent (results wise) in the bunch once all signed, and if one had to be traded after #63 gets locked up, it would likely be Kadri, who appears to be the best player of the bunch. I'm a big fan of committing to star power (hence my approval of the mammoth deals for Kessel and Phaneuf), but middle-ground type players come around a lot more often and shouldn't have potential to handicap you in the long run.

In other words, get Toronto's top men on lowering David's expectations. Nonis. Leiweke. The Phil. Drake. Anybody in MLSE, really. Because if the Leafs take the plunge for what's currently being talked about, it's not likely to end well.

7cb905bdffc4d09e93770ff4a1889462
I bring news about the Toronto Marlies, opinions about the Toronto Maple Leafs, and a bunch of ridiculous thoughts about everything else.
Avatar
#1 MaxPower417
February 25 2014, 08:49PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
12
props

I think you choose salary comps that were a little high this time. It's probably better to find contracts equal after inflation is taking into account, not before.

That said, if they sign Bolland for 5 million I'm going to freaking lose it.

Avatar
#2 Mark
February 26 2014, 05:30AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
4
props

I'd rather the Leafs pass on Bolland and use that money on someone else. Make Holland the 3C and sign Kulemin and a 4C instead of spending 4-5M on Bolland. It'd be one thing if the Leafs didn't have depth at center, but they've got a guy who is ready and able to play in Bolland's spot in Holland.

There's no point of even slightly overpaying Bolland when you've got a guy ready to take over.

Avatar
#3 Ryan
February 26 2014, 05:48AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
3
props

Bolland for 4-5 years, 4.5 per. Book it.

I look forward to losing my mind (again).

Fire Dave Nonis.

Avatar
#4 Ben
February 26 2014, 06:05AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
7
props

So objective, so nice. I think I agree on all counts.

God would it be nice to see Kulemin given an extended look in the shutdown centre role. If he's game for it I think it would give the Leafs a ton of leverage with Bolland and McClement.

If Kulemin is let go in favour of those two I'm going to be extremely disappointed.

Avatar
#5 Leaf Fan in Mexico
February 26 2014, 09:20AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
2
props

@MaxPower417

3 at $3.2 m is fair?

Avatar
#6 leafswantstanley
February 26 2014, 10:40AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
10
props

Did Bolland tear a tendon on his leg or an artery in his brain?

7-8 years at 5mil is unbelievable for a #3C coming off a Major injury.

Avatar
#7 STAN
February 26 2014, 10:49AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
4
props
Ben wrote:

So objective, so nice. I think I agree on all counts.

God would it be nice to see Kulemin given an extended look in the shutdown centre role. If he's game for it I think it would give the Leafs a ton of leverage with Bolland and McClement.

If Kulemin is let go in favour of those two I'm going to be extremely disappointed.

Absolutely right on point. Kulemin has everything you want in a big second or third line centre - speed, great hands, wicked shot and decent puck awareness. The Leafs would be nuts to choose Bolland and McClemet over him. But that;s why we play this speculation game, right?

Nonis, Leiweke and ownership[ apparently had no qualms in paying Grabovski multi-millions to go away, so anything is possible, and with this management crew probable.

Kulemin's comments after playing a little centre were all positive. Thus, the only issue seems to be Carlyle's reluctance to think outside his narrow, old-school mentality.

Avatar
#8 MaxPower417
February 26 2014, 11:24AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
5
props

@Leaf Fan in Mexico

Probably, but he won't take that. I'd rather give him a little more money for one year to see if he can still skate. After a full season in blue and white, we can talk about a longer term deal based on reality and not a 15 game hot streak.

I'd also let Kule continue to play center for the rest of the season (assuming he can continue to play competently) and put Bolland on the wing in the name of "easing him back in" to remove some of his leverage.

Avatar
#9 MathMan
February 26 2014, 12:46PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
2
props

Plekanec is Montreal's top tough-minutes forward. He's leaned on to take on the defensive assignments while still generating some offense. Despite Montreal's much-stunted possession game this year, he remains an effective scorer at evens, but he's been bumped down to second-unit PP since the time he signed his contract. He does kill penalties a lot though.

Perfectly worth the 5 million in a way Bolland is not; he's good for 50-60 points while taking on top centers and generally doing the kind of defensive job people think Bolland does.

Avatar
#10 Wendy Clark
February 26 2014, 01:48PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
7
props

This is all on Nonis. First he signs Clarkson to 6 mil/ year. Now every 3rd line plug wants the moon.

Avatar
#11 MaxPower417
February 26 2014, 03:09PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
4
props

@Wendy Clark

5.25 but yeah. It's painful to see Clarkson and Bozak's contracts being held up as comps. Those contracts are the gifts that keep on giving...

Comments are closed for this article.