Sexism and the All-Star Fantasy Draft


Dreams really do come true.

Last night the NHL held the All-Star Fantasy Draft for the second time. While it gives adult fans an opportunity to play Statler and Waldorf on Twitter after each pick, it is really meant for the children. As last year’s Guardian Project demonstrated, the NHL sees the All-Star game as an opportunity to sell the game to its younger fans.  The Fantasy Draft sent a very sexist message to those kids last night.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Young fans, boys and girls alike, tune into the draft to see their favourite players and which team they get drafted to. James Duthie specifically mentioned that the idea behind the draft is to evoke the memories of when the players were young, “tossing sticks into the middle, choosing Captains, and picking teams.” Kids watching at home can imagine themselves up on stage being drafted and putting on an All-Star sweater. Well the boys can. If you’re a young female hockey fan your options for daydreaming are slightly more limited. You can imagine yourself on-stage, dressed in tights and heels silently handing each player their sweater.

There were exactly three women visibly involved in the Fantasy Draft: the two aforementioned sweater shuttles, and Alyonka Larionov. Alyonka was relegated backstage to read off tweets that the Athletes were sending during the draft.

Being a man I’m obviously not the most qualified to speak on these things. And I don’t presume to speak for an entire gender, but what I saw last night bothered me. Female hockey fans have it tough. Their opinions are often marginalized due to their gender and the assumption that they are “Puck Bunnies” who only follow the sport because they have a crush on every player.

Watching last night’s coverage of the draft suggested that TSN feels the same way. While it may not have been TSN’s intention to use Alyonka solely as “eye candy” a quick scan of her mentions on Twitter show that many male viewers did.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below





Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Fantastic stuff there. 

This may not bother you; it may not even bother Alyonka Larionov. Adults can decide for themselves what they find offensive or objectionable. Children cannot. To the boys and girls watching at home last night the NHL sent a very strong message: female hockey fans and their opinions are not to be taken seriously. Female hockey analysts and reporters are under-represented in the MSM. There are many excellent female bloggers who are passionate about the game and offer insightful commentary. They have no representaton on nights like this. I don’t think that’s right. 

What’s worse is that girls watching at home dreaming of playing in the All-Star game one day were given two choices for when they grow up: handing out sweaters or reading tweets. 


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • daoust

    “What’s worse is that girls watching at home dreaming of playing in the All-Star game one day were given two choices for when they grow up: handing out sweaters or reading tweets.”

    LOL. I think the fact that there are no female All Stars delivered this message plain and clear already.

  • Well said. My 9 year old daughter has set her goal of playing in the NHL someday. Sure it’s a dream but, as dreams go, it’s a great one and who is the NHL to dissuade her? I like good looking women too – heck my wife’s one – but you are absolutely right. Hey why not pick some minor hockey kids to hand out the jerseys? Could you imagine the PR coup?

  • I appreciate this article and the point it’s making. Being a female is tough. You can’t be a fan that knows everything without being picked on for knowing too much of a “mans sport.” There is a fine line between what you can and can’t enjoy at a game… It’s all very frustrating.

  • SkinnyFish

    I don’t believe that journalism is necessarily about finding a solution or offering advice. A male advising women in an article that there is an easy fix to hundreds of years of sexism wouldn’t have been right or even plausible because there is none.

    Great job on the article Mr. Gray.

  • SkinnyFish

    Why not just shorten your ‘argument’ to “Well that’s the way it’s always been so why change it?” Further is very disingenuous to say that ‘men are sexist’. Some men are sexist, and as Danny pointed out, some of those are the decision makers for the NHL and TSN.

  • SkinnyFish

    Ah yes, attack mode. You called people hypocrites, I asked you to prove it, and I’m attacking you. Yep, that’s how it goes because the burden of proof isn’t on you at all. Yep.

  • SkinnyFish

    You heard him folks. We’ve all be had by attempting to counter the ‘arguments’ of a couple of misogynist idiots. Boy is there ever egg on our faces now.