Photo Credit: Peter Llewellyn/USA TODAY Sports

Cody Franson is an obvious off-season target for the Maple Leafs

If the Toronto Maple Leafs are going to upgrade the right side of their defensive depth chart, there aren’t many options available to them in free agency. The good news is that one of those few options, Cody Franson, obviously has a warm place in his heart for the club.

Franson told Sportsnet’s Chris Johnston in April that he was open to a return, describing playing in Toronto as “a dream come true” and pointing out that he’d said similar things in many past interviews. If the Leafs were to make him a priority target this summer, one would have to think that they would have a good shot at landing him. The bigger question is whether he’s a good fit.

It’s certainly something we may assume is on the team’s radar. A month before Johnston’s piece, Elliotte Friedman wrote that Toronto had been linked to Franson at the trade deadline, which would suggest the club has at least some measure of interest.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Obviously they didn’t land Franson then, but it’s hard to read too much into that. The Sabres ended up keeping both Franson and fellow UFA Dmitry Kulikov at the deadline (then-Buffalo Sabres GM Tim Murray said he was “surprised”) when their interest would have been best-served by trading those players. The market for rentals can vary widely from year to year, and in trying to land the best possible return it would seem that Buffalo just ended up missing an opportunity to recoup some assets.

What we can do is make our own assessment of Franson’s utility and his fit with the Leafs.

Toronto finished the year with four right-shot defenders. Rookie Nikita Zaitsev averaged just over 22 minutes per game in all situations and is a restricted free agent this summer. Roman Polak came in just under 18 minutes at evens and on the penalty kill. Connor Carrick and Alexey Marchenko didn’t get much special teams use and played third-pair minutes at evens.

Zaitsev is a restricted free agent and seems likely to return. Carrick and Marchenko are both under contract for next year, though there’s some expansion draft risk with Marchenko (assuming that Carrick is protected). Polak is an unrestricted free agent and a little harder to gauge because although he and Carrick are wildly different players both are obvious fits in a third-pairing role, with the distinction that Carrick is much younger and probably much cheaper.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

The slot for Franson at evens is in a top-four role, along with Zaitsev, Morgan Rielly and Jake Gardiner. He’d also be available for minutes on the power play and penalty kill, as he’s played in both situations previously.

Toronto’s power play, which was the NHL’s second-best by goals-per-minute, doesn’t need much help; Franson would be more luxury than need there. Nevertheless, over the last four seasons he’s one of the league’s better power play point producers, averaging more than four points per hour in 5-on-4 situations. That compares nicely to players like Duncan Keith, Dustin Byfuglien and Oliver Ekman-Larsson, and puts Franson ahead of Maple Leafs defender Jake Gardiner over the same span.

It’s a similar situation on the penalty kill. The Leafs were a top-10 team by goals against-per-minute last season and should be reasonably satisfied with their work in that department. I’m not satisfied that we really have a good all-purpose statistic for players on the penalty kill, but what we do have makes Franson look pretty average for an NHL defenceman. He’s in the middle tier of blue liners in terms of Corsi against and goals against relative to his teammates.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

The biggest questions come at even-strength. A player with Franson’s size and reach should be competent on the penalty kill. A player with his shot, handedness and offensive instincts should be more than competent on the power play.

At even-strength, though, is where the weaknesses often cited in his game come to the fore. Even-strength play puts an emphasis on skating, and Franson’s only passable in that regard. There’s also generally a desire to see some snarl from a 6’5”, 234-pound defenceman, and that has never been Franson’s game.

It’s probably not worth overstating those warts, which have to be balanced against his good points: skill with the puck, size, reach and intelligence. His teams generally take more shots for and allow fewer against when he’s on the ice. They also, as a rule, have better goal differential when he’s out there, and this despite the fact that he’s generally been deployed more like a defensive than offensive specialist.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Franson is far from a perfect player, but he’s useful in a variety of situations and does more well than poorly. He turns 30 this summer, and should be a reasonably low-risk signing on even a two- or three-year deal. He’s not a perfect fit, but if Toronto can’t find that perfect fit he’s the best stopgap they’re likely to get.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Stan Smith

    To me, Franson’s problems as a Leaf centred around his defensive game, and decision making. Granted he is older now, but is he really any better? You mention his play on the PP and PK. This past season he spent almost 100 minutes in the PP and a grand total of 2 pts. As for the PK. six dmen on the sabres had more ice time SH than he did. He is coming off of a contract that paid him $3.3 M and knowing him, is probably looking for a lot more. To me, he was a disappointment the last time he was with the Leafs, and odds are he would be that all over again. I say move on.

    • The Russian Rocket

      I was a Franson fan when he was in Toronto but I’d take Carrick over Franson today. Carrick likely has the higher offensive ceiling (he’s 23 and one season removed from leading the AHL in playoff scoring) and his hockey intelligence is sky-high. Franson has a huge size advantage but his foot speed is worrying. Great dude but I wouldn’t bring him back into the fold if I were the Leafs.

    • lukewarmwater

      Stan this article is one of the reasons I tend to refer to other web sites. As you astutely pointed out he was a pylon when he was previously with the leafs and obviously is even slower as he ages. I really can’t take an article like this serious.

        • Gary Empey

          Refering to Franson as a pylon is probably too harsh. As you stated yourself regarding skating, “Franson’s only passable in that regard.” I believe that Leafs are attempting to be the fastest team at every position in the league. How easy that is to accomplish remains to be seen. As Mick Jaggar stated ” You can’t always get what you want.” He is available and it is fair comment to consider him as a possibility.

          • lukewarmwater

            Gary I totally agree, we went through the Franson years when we were a horrible team. The guy just doesn’t even come close to what Babs, Lou and Shanahan are planning. Believe it or not the name of the game is speed on defence unless you are a warrior like Polak. Franson is no warrior.

        • lukewarmwater

          Then again, likely before you were a hockey fan another genius gave up the number three pick in the draft for the great Tom Kurvers who originally came into the league as 3rd round pick by the Habs got traded to New Jersey for a fourth but the Ballard had to have Kurvers and that 3rd pick in the draft became some defencemen named Niedemayer. So yeah owners and G.M.’s are quite capable of making idiot moves.

          • Glen

            That is just one of the terrible trades made in the past to ‘improve” the team. That is why the team should hesitate before they give away Nylander or Kapanan at this point in time for an unproven or veteran D.

      • Gary Empey

        Re-Trading deadline….Teams acquiring players at the deadline also had to look at their required expansion exposure/protection list. Adding Franson at that time, if he was signed, automatically that would have exposed Carrick or Franson, unless he was considered a pure rental.

        Babcock had Carrick playing top four pairing all year. Why is he an obvious fit for a third-pairing role next year?

      • AussieBoy

        I got an idea
        We get Franson,then get Phil,Dion, Nonis and Bourke to come back.
        Fire Lou,Babs and Shanny.
        And trade Auston for a bag of pucks.
        Because that would make more sense than taking Franson seriously again.
        Why is this even a thing?
        My head hurts.