Photo Credit: Tom Szczerbowski-USA TODAY Sports

What if we let CapFriendly’s Armchair GM become the Leafs’ actual GM?

In general, most hockey fans are idiots. Leafs fans, especially. This isn’t much of a surprise to anyone, but letting fandom get in the way of how you run a hockey team is never really a good call.

As the title suggests, we decided to rehash an old idea:

If the HFBoards Ran the Leafs

If the HFBoards Started the Leafs Rebuild

and let a culmination of CapFriendly armchair GMs take control.

The projected roster:

*Extremely Talking Heads voice…*

But wait? How did I get here?

(You can find the list of trades and signings here.)

The Tanev/Goldobin deal

Nylander for Tanev finally happens!

The Byfuglien deal

Zaitsev, Kapanen, Borgman, and two picks are on the outs for Big Buff.


The same return as another Leafs’ d-man.

The Murphy deal

The Night that Connor Murphy got traded is a night I’ll never forget. Some of the b’ys got loaded drunk and they ain’t been sober yet.

Weber for everyone

Liljegren, Timashov, Carrick, Nielsen, Gauthier, a 1st, and a 3rd, for Shea Weber. Hrm, I’d take Subban first…

Hainsey for a coupla seconds.

Why not? I guess.

Matt Martin and Ozhiganov for a 7th

I actually started this when Martin was still on the roster, but this is basically what they got for him anyway.

JT Brown deal

The Leafs gain a second and a player who was on waivers for Zach Hyman. So a second for Zach Hyman.

Lawson Crouse

LAWSON CROUSE for a fifth and two Marlies prospects. Probably not but. Dream big.

Nick Jensen!!!!!!!!!

Toronto acquires the best Red Wings defenceman.

There was another trade that sent out McElhinney, but, like. Are you really worried about that?

Strengths and weaknesses

If we break down the roster, the Leafs probably come out on top on defence, although it’s hardly without a price. While getting rid of Ron Hainsey and Nikita Zaitsev probably improve the team, we don’t see the impact of Jake Gardiner leaving in a directly positive way because he was moved out for draft picks.

The biggest decline would be on the wings, adding five new wingers who have yet to play a full season in the NHL. J.T. Brown seems like a standup fellow and not the worst crash-and-bang option in the league, but also put up just 7 points in 47 games across two teams last season.

Centre depth is the least unchanged, although someone’s bright idea involved bringing in Pavel Datsyuk on a one-year deal. Whatever makes Wings fans most irrationally upset, I guess.

So how good is this team actually?

I employed a very unadvanced stats of asking smarter people who project models what they think of the team.

Dom Luszczyszyn of the Athletic used his model to give the Toronto Armchair Leafs a 98-point projection. While we’ll get an answer in the next few weeks as to what the actual Leafs look like next year in his season previews, I’d suggest the Leafs likely come out slightly higher than that.

Meanwhile, for a projection of the Leafs’ actual roster… Manny Perry of Corsica.Hockey projects the Leafs at about… 98 points.

It should be noted that Perry and Dom feel differently about the JVR/Bozak subbed in for Tavares move.

Meanwhile Dom wrote this for the Athletic, although we haven’t yet see what that point projection looks like just yet with the Leafs’ full roster.

Toronto’s point projection for next season saw the second highest jump in the league despite technically losing more value than it gained. There’s no denying the Leafs are a much better team after adding Tavares despite who they lost. Quality over quantity.

Should the Leafs do this?

No. Without taking into account contracts, the roster does okay over the next year, and would likely still be a playoff roster. They’ve improved their defense somewhat, and somehow managed to convince Pavel Datsyuk to enter their fourth line, but sewering what is a genuine strength at wing doesn’t seem to make a ton of sense. Eight more years of Shea Weber? Four more years of Connor Murphy? Seven million in cap space for… some reason?

Plus, William Nylander is gone!  If there’s a moral to this story, it’s that you might as well appreciate your strengths where you have them. If the Leafs look to drastically improve their D just to do it, it probably would come at the cost of hindering their offence. I couldn’t think of a worse way to “optimize” the roster, but it did provide us with an article in August.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.