Photo Credit: Bob DeChiara / USA TODAY Sports

Why the Leafs should consider a trade for Colin Miller

When looking at each team’s protected list for the expansion drafts a lot of decisions stood out to me as inexplicable and one of those decisions was the Boston Bruins protecting Kevan Miller over Colin Miller.

In Kevan you have a 29-year-old defender with virtually zero offensive upside, who doesn’t drive play and who makes $2.5 million for the next three seasons. I mean, his hockeydb page dates back to the 2007-08 season and his highest goal total is five, which was during the 2015-16 season.

In Colin you have a (soon to be) 25-year-old defender who has scored at a good rate at both the major junior (shouts Sault Ste. Marie) and AHL level, plays on your second powerplay unit, has the best relative shot differential numbers on the team and only makes $1 million next season. After that he’s an RFA with no leverage, so you’re still likely going to get him on a cheaper deal (and with less term if you’d like) than Kevan after that.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Although Colin’s counting stats over his 103 career NHL regular season games don’t jump off the page at you, his shot metrics do. Over the past two seasons, Miller’s first two in the NHL, nine defenders have played at least 500 minutes at 5v5. During that time, Miller leads Bruins defenders in suppressing shot attempts against per hour relative to when he is off the ice and is second, behind only Krug, in creating shot attempts for relative to when he is off the ice. Still, he hasn’t been given the ice-time he seems to have earned. During the 2016-17 season, Miller averaged 15:48 minutes of ice-time per game, an entire second more per game than in ’15-16! He’s on pace for 15:49 next year unless they decide they gave him way too much last year and want to bring him back to where he was at the previous season. Sarcasm aside, he was given the least amount of ice-time per game among the Bruins’ relatively weak defence group last year and the only one who averaged less the year before was Joe Morrow, who only played in 17 games. That’s including the powerplay time he receives. Despite clearly not being trusted by former head coach Claude Julien and Bruins’ new bench boss Bruce Cassidy, he seems to be thriving when given the opportunity and it’s showing up in the goal differential department.

*Green cell = best Red cell = worst

Remember that in the shots-for department (AKA Corsi for AKA CF) the higher the better and in the shots against department (AKA Corsi against AKA CA) the lower the better. What really stands out to me is that Miller leads the Bruins in suppressing shots against by a mile, yet he’s utilized as an offensive specialist, playing limited 5v5 minutes, no shorthanded time and playing on the powerplay. That got me wondering how he was utilized during his 5v5 minutes and, as it turns out, the dude has virtually never seen a defensive zone draw. Well, except that one time.

Maybe that explains why the coaches don’t trust him in the defensive zone. All jokes aside, he has been extremely sheltered. Like, one of the most sheltered defenders in the NHL.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Miller wasn’t even trusted to start a shift with a neutral zone faceoff, forget defensive zone. There are only seven defenders who have played at least 20 games over the past two seasons who have a lower defensive zone faceoff percentage, the one notable one being Shayne Gostisbehere of the Flyers. So, is Miller an elite defensive defenceman as his shot suppression numbers imply? Probably not. Is he a total liability in the defensive zone like his coaches seem to believe? Probably not. Has he earned a chance to prove what he can do in a larger role? Definitely.

So, why on Earth am I talking about Colin Miller on a Leafs blog right now? Because I think there could be a fit with the Leafs. Miller is likely going to be taken in the expansion draft, or at least he should be, but there are a lot of good defencemen available for Vegas to potentially take. That being the case, Miller could end up in the same situation he’s in right now with the Bruins, or he could even end up in the pressbox, which would be a shame. If that’s the case, it would be best for both parties if Vegas flipped him for assets after selecting him. Seeing as he hasn’t been given much of an opportunity up to this point in his career, he probably wouldn’t be particularly expensive to trade for. He may not be the sexiest name out there in terms of RHD people have been discussing potentially coming to the Leafs, but if they can’t get their hands on a Josh Manson or a Mark Psyk, why not give Miller his opportunity to prove what he can do? As I said earlier, he’s only got one year left on his contract at a bargain price of $1 million, so there isn’t much to lose as long as you don’t have to give up too much in a trade. I could get on board with starting next year with the defence pairings looking like this:


Advertisement - Continue Reading Below



A lot of people might disagree with me on this due to all the talk being of getting a top pairing RHD this summer, and that would definitely be ideal, but I think they could do a lot worse than this.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Miller might not be at the top of everyone’s wishlist, but he could be a low cost, high value buy.

*data via puckalytics.com and NHL.com

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Stan Smith

    I really have no idea what the reasoning is behind the decision. One thing that does stand out is the fact the Colin Miller was only used in offensive situations. If that was the case they must have felt he had issues defensively. As for shot suppression, I feel that is a stat that is way over-rated for dmen. A dman can be better at suppression shots, but the chances that he takes in doing that, could lead to being out of defensive position more, and giving up better scoring chances.

  • Regulator Johnson

    This would be a great idea if we were trying to fill roster slots in the middle of a rebuild. That is not the position the Leafs currently find themselves in.

  • STAN

    Miller and/or Manson. Lets keep these guys all around the same age and let them grow with that dynamic forward group. My only exception might be Franson (as urged by Petersversion). Shattenkirk is overrated and Carl Alzner is too slow.


    Completely agree with this article.

    I have obviously raved about Colin Miller for the last few weeks, and definitely overvalued him to a certain extent, mainly because I do believe he’s a top 4 defenceman who can potentially be acquired through Vegas for a relatively cheap price compared to others like Matt Dumba who I think are a lot more higher-profile and more expensive to acquire.

    So, yeah, ideally I would LOVE for the Leafs to trade for someone like Jacob Trouba without having to include Rielly or the Big Three but that’s highly unlikely.

    Sign Shattenkirk? Yeah, I would be OK with that too.

    But Colin Miller is a solid option that would most likely not cost more than a 2nd rounder.

    He’s a great backup option as well if you try and fail to acquire someone else later in the off-season.

  • rugape

    lets not forget McPhee said anyone will have to overpay to do a double swap, as they should. C. Miller is not the caliber of player I would overpay for. go big or go home, if we can’t get a trouba, dumba, manson, then we find another route, not this one.

  • Hugh Allan

    I think Miller. Would be a good acquisition. My preference is Dumba but he would be very expensive. Probably the Leafs 1st round pick and a prospect or possibly JVR. Miller is young (24) with a lot of upside. In his last year in the AHL he won the fastest skater and hardest shot in the skills competition. He has some warts (defensive) but so did Gardner and look what Babcock has been able to do with him. Leafs should know Miller quite well as he played for the Sault Greyhounds while Dubas was the GM. For the right price I, for one, would be very happy to see the Leafs acquireMiller.

  • magesticRAGE

    I have been against the Leafs making a big trade, to try and go for it when it’s clear that the team is still learning to run. I don’t want Shatenkirk or Franson, and I think it would cost too much for Manson. This though, Colin Miller, I can get down with that. The Leafs are still in the tail end of the rebuild, and value signings is still route to take (not bad contracts). It is the reason that the two Swedes were signed, it only cost them $ to sign highly touted pros, young pros. Miller seems to fit the bill, but I am unsure about his skating as of yet.