What Phil Kessel and the Leafs need up front
By Cam Charron
11 years agoIf you have yet to read Kent Wilson’s excellent “Content over style” post from last week over at Flames Nation, go and do so. Kent explains the vital importance of avoiding stylistic traps when evaluating a hockey player, instead focusing on the big picture: does the player do things that helps the team win games?
One area I think where the focus on player qualities over player outcomes can muddle things is in team building, specifically when it comes to player categorization, ie; “roles” on a club. For example, NHL teams primarily employ bigger, tougher players in their bottom six forward rotation, especially when it comes to the the 4th unit. This is often an area where folks stop asking pertinent questions (can this guy outplay his opponents? Does he drive goal differential?) are instead start focusing on particular qualities (is he big? Is he mean? Can he fight?). This is how a person decides, for instance, to buy out Nigel Dawes after a 15-goal season only to to sign Raitis Ivanans.
We know that Brian Burke wants to add size to his top six, but what he really needs to do is add a guy who can drive play. Phil Kessel needs a guy next to him who can do that, and here’s why:
Kessel is a skilled scoring winger who has more goals (99) over the last three seasons than all but nine players: Steven Stamkos (156) Alex Ovechkin (120) Corey Perry (114) Patrick Marleau (111) Ilya Kovalchuk (109) Jarome Iginla (107) Marian Gaborik (105) Bobby Ryan (100) and Daniel Sedin (100).
Does this matter? Indubitably, yes. But goal-scoring is only one attribute of a hockey player, and it’s particularly empty if you consider that the Leafs may be giving up as many goals at the other end of the ice that Kessel helps the get on offence.
In the three years that Kessel has been a Leaf, the team has gone from 8th (51.6%) to 26th (46.4%) to 28th (46.7%) in Fenwick Close, and shot-differential rate that indicates team quality and can predict the teams’ success.
The team has fallen every year under Kessel and they had a very promising 2009 and 2010. The problem is that management made the wrong moves, eliminating the promising Viktor Stalberg and surprisingly effective low minutes players Jamie Lundmark, John Mitchell and Garnet Exelby. Lee Stempniak as well was a surprising talent with a Corsi per 60 of 12.8 in 2010 and hasn’t wavered too much, putting up a 4.62 in 2012 with Calgary.
In 2011, Burke got rid of two play drivers, François Beauchemin and Tomas Kaberle. Mike Komisarek got bad, and the trade for Dion Phaneuf couldn’t mitigate all these losses. While skilled, the Toronto Maple Leafs now only had a few players who could really drive play. At the end of the 2010 season, 9 of 13 Leafs with 50 games played were plus Corsi players. After 2011, that number had slipped to just 3 of 14.
So where does this put Kessel? He isn’t exactly synonymous with the 2010-2011 in Team Corsi, but here’s how he’s looked in his NHL career:
Corsi Rel | Corsi ON | QoC | Ozone | |
2008 | 6.4 | 7.0 | 0.581 | 46.8% |
2009 | 6.9 | 7.2 | 0.438 | 50.6% |
2010 | 4.9 | 9.4 | -0.035 | 52.4% |
2011 | -2.2 | -6.6 | 0.280 | 51.3% |
2012 | 3.2 | -0.3 | 0.337 | 54.3% |
With Kessel | Without Kessel | |||
Bozak | 0.483 | 0.384 | ||
Lupul | 0.484 | 0.396 | ||
Connolly | 0.438 | 0.483 | ||
MacArthur | 0.475 | 0.516 | ||
Lombardi | 0.473 | 0.456 | ||
Grabovski | 0.619 | 0.530 | ||
Frattin | 0.485 | 0.487 | ||
Steckel | 0.580 | 0.482 | ||
Combined | 0.485 | 0.492 |
Recent articles from Cam Charron