How do the Leafs incumbents measure up to the goaltending market

Photo credit:Sergei Belski-USA TODAY Sports
Jon Steitzer
2 years ago
The Leafs are going to be aggressively dipping their toes into the waters of the goaltending market this summer, but should they? The answer definitely seems to be yes. Taking a look at five goaltending measures from last season it’s clear there are some options out there that the Leafs might want to explore.
The numbers used are from Moneypuck and goaltenders needed to play in at least 16 games to be on the list. There are 67 goaltenders in the league who met that criteria and are ranked.
Goals Saved Above expected/60
Eric Comrie0.6032nd
Darcy Kuemper0.3877th
Ville Husso0.3468th
Matt Murray0.16318th
Scott Wedgewood0.04627th
Braden Holtby0.03229th
Jack Campbell-0.04936th
Alexandar Georgiev-0.23449th
John Gibson-0.26550th
Marc-Andre Fleury-0.32154th
Petr Mrazek-0.66864th
Kevin Lankinen0.94566th
Consider this first table your introduction to three truths.
  1. Jack Campbell is decidedly middle of the pack.
  2. Petr Mrazek is consistently at the bottom.
  3. Eric Comrie is worth the look in the 1B position.
Save % Above Expected
Eric Comrie0.0122nd
Darcy Kuemper0.0077th
Ville Husso0.0068th
Matt Murray0.00320th
Scott Wedgewood0.00126th
Braden Holtby0.00128th
Jack Campbell-0.00137th
John Gibson-0.00447th
Alexandar Georgiev-0.00450th
Marc-Andre Fleury-0.00552nd
Petr Mrazek-0.01365th
Kevin Lankinen-0.01866th
These numbers are very much a mirror of what is seen above. Interestingly, they might be making a case for Matt Murray, a goaltender speculated on recently, and showing that John Gibson doesn’t represent any improvement over Jack Campbell. This might change in later graphs, but Alexandar Georgiev is beginning to look like a reclamation project rather than a potential starter. Is a reclamation project the way the Leafs will want to start off working with a new goaltending coach?
Wins Above Replacement
Darcy Kuemper3.495th
Ville Husso2.269th
Eric Comrie1.7214th
Matt Murray0.5324th
Scott Wedgewood0.2727th
Braden Holtby0.1130th
Jack Campbell-0.3939th
Alexandar Georgiev-1.1447th
Petr Mrazek-1.9456th
John Gibson-2.3861th
Marc-Andre Fleury-2.9464th
Kevin Lankinen-4.7766th
If you are wondering why Mrazek took the jump here, it’s because this isn’t a rate stat. This is based on time played, which makes Comrie’s results even more impressive. I don’t know how much of Fleury and Lankinen’s numbers on being in Chicago, but at this point I’d hope that even with Fleury being a recent Vezina winner, he’s probably established himself as too much of a risk for the cost that will be associated with him.
High Danger Unblocked Shot Attempt Save %
John Gibson0.8302nd
Ville Husso0.74212th
Eric Comrie0.72719th
Darcy Kuemper0.71324th
Matt Murray0.71226th
Braden Holtby0.70727th
Jack Campbell0.67640th
Alexandar Georgiev0.67143rd
Kevin Lankinen0.65050th
Scott Wedgewood0.64851st
Marc-Andre Fleury0.63058th
Petr Mrazek0.59563rd
Here’s where you really get at the heart of the Leafs struggles last season, and where John Gibson does establish himself as an upgrade. If you believe that a lot of the other numbers are influenced by a bad Anaheim team, this shows there is still an elite goaltender in there somewhere. As for Mrazek, those numbers are straight-up unacceptable, and even if he was fitting with injuries he shouldn’t be a risk the Leafs want to take again.
High Danger Unblocked Shot Attempt Save % Above Expected
John Gibson0.1331st
Darcy Kuemper0.05216th
Ville Husso0.05217th
Eric Comrie0.04618th
Matt Murray0.02328th
Braden Holtby0.00936th
Jack Campbell-0.0144th
Kevin Lankinen-0.02649th
Alexandar Georgiev-0.03453rd
Scott Wedgewood-0.03655th
Marc-Andre Fleury-0.0459th
Petr Mrazek-0.09466th
This is a lot more of the same and looking at the gap in the rankings, especially you can see where Gibson is still up there with the best in the league stopping high danger chances and that’s an area you can always build off of.


There are enough options of either higher quality or potential low cost that make returning to Jack Campbell a bad idea.
Petr Mrazek was straight up bad, and bringing him back simply because they know he can be better is hoping for a dead cat bounce on a goaltender that has struggled with injury issues over the past few seasons. It’s easy to find a way to move on.
John Gibson certainly addresses the biggest area of need for the Leafs but is still likely to be regarded as a goaltender that will cost a lot to acquire. It doesn’t seem unrealistic that he can rediscover his elite results, so contract be damned, assets will need to be given up.
Every effort should be made to bring in Eric Comrie as the 1B. He’s consistently at the top with a small sample but was considered to have a lot of upside when drafted. He could be coming into his own and might be the best long term stability option at a good price.
Kuemper and Husso are both good, but to some extent are products of good teams. They’ll cost a fair bit, but Husso might cost a little less because he’s less established. That younger, less established aspect might also make him a longer term solution, which intrigues me a bit more.
Braden Holtby is a safety school. Someone to consider if the first choices don’t pan out because he still has some hockey left in him, even if his numbers might also be aided by a strong Dallas blue line.
Goaltenders like Georgiev and Lankinen were interesting to me before this exercise, but the only way they make sense is if you wind up with a goaltending coach who is adamant he can change them, or in Lankinen’s situation he might be willing to accept a 3rd string position and replace Michael Hutchinson.
By the numbers it is clear the Leafs can get better and have some decent options to do so, especially considering this is by no means the full list of goaltenders that will be on the move.
More from TheLeafsNation.com


PointsBet is live in Ontario. Get started here.

Check out these posts...