<p>The summer boredom is soon coming to an end and with that, the opportunity to drop in non-newsy posts about hockey is coming to an end as well. That probably serves you the readers well, but we&#8217;re not quite there yet. Instead I give you an idea stolen from 538&#8230;</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Who is baseball&#8217;s most average player? <a href="https://t.co/dfhCjtbm6Y">https://t.co/dfhCjtbm6Y</a></p>
<p>— FiveThirtyEight (@FiveThirtyEight) <a href="https://twitter.com/FiveThirtyEight/status/1166463544969314306?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 27, 2019</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting, right?</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s a bit easier to do that with baseball than it is to do with hockey, but screw it, I&#8217;m going to try anyways using 6 equally weighted measures for forwards, 6 equally weighted measures for defensemen, and ditto for the goaltenders. The end result, you guessed it, a completely average team.</p>
<p><strong>The Forward Criteria</strong></p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t an attempt a truly profound analytical model. This is just some fun to have in late August, so that being said the categories are time on ice, points, expected goals for %, corsi for %, penalty minutes, and hits. I can sense a lot of you cringing and others shrugging in acceptance.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s where the title of the post becomes quite misleading. I&#8217;m not looking at averages, I&#8217;m looking at percentiles for each of these categories and then averaging them out. Annoyed yet? Sure you are. In reality only a select few of you are actually reading the methodology part, so I can put whatever I want in here. Banana fart sundae. See? No one is even going to acknowledge that.</p>
<p>Here are your forwards&#8230;</p>
<table width="236">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="121">Player</td>
<td width="29">Pos</td>
<td width="39">Avg</td>
<td width="47">Dif</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mario Kempe</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>0.500</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Trevor Lewis</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.500</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mikko Koivu</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.500</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kyle Turris</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.502</td>
<td>0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Luke Glendening</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.502</td>
<td>0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brandon Dubinsky</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.498</td>
<td>-0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dale Weise</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>0.498</td>
<td>-0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alex Galchenyuk</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.497</td>
<td>-0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lukas Radil</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.497</td>
<td>-0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>J.T. Brown</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>0.495</td>
<td>-0.005</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Raffl</td>
<td>L</td>
<td>0.495</td>
<td>-0.005</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dominik Kahun</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.495</td>
<td>-0.005</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jason Pominville</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>0.507</td>
<td>0.007</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>This is the most Minnesota Wild team that ever Minnesota Wilded. Not just because of the number of current or former Wild players on it, but the fact that is absolutely a perpetual bubble team group. It&#8217;s entirely possible that Turris and Galchenyuk are better than average, but using just 2018-19 numbers, this is how it shakes out.</p>
<p><strong>The Defense Criteria</strong></p>
<p>Well, it would be boring if I did it exactly the same as the forwards, so we&#8217;ll switch it up and go with ice time, points, hits, penalties, blocked shots, and corsi against. I&#8217;m writing this before seeing the results, so I can tell you, I&#8217;m excited to see what this produces.</p>
<table width="204">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="121">Player</td>
<td width="39">Avg</td>
<td width="44">Dif</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Igor Ozhiganov</td>
<td>0.501</td>
<td>0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Radim Simek</td>
<td>0.499</td>
<td>-0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Josh Brown</td>
<td>0.502</td>
<td>0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jordan Oesterle</td>
<td>0.503</td>
<td>0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sami Vatanen</td>
<td>0.510</td>
<td>0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ben Harpur</td>
<td>0.490</td>
<td>-0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cam Fowler</td>
<td>0.489</td>
<td>-0.011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jonathan Ericsson</td>
<td>0.483</td>
<td>-0.017</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>There&#8217;s the Leafs content you expect to see on Leafs blog. While Ozhiganov may have moved on, using my hastily thrown together criteria he was the most average defenseman in the NHL last season. I&#8217;m not sure what witchcraft I cast to lump Vatanen and Fowler into this mix, but there will be no second guessing of this, and we will all accept that Ben Harpur is marginally better than Cam Fowler. After all, hits, PIMs, and blocked shots, dude.</p>
<p><strong>The Goaltender Criteria</strong></p>
<p>While I think it is important to acknowledge their voodoo, and the fact that pretty much every goaltender has the same stats, I&#8217;ll proceed with the charade that is already producing what is a completely nonsensical lineup, that does in fact seem capable of being the 16th best team in the league.</p>
<p>For goaltenders we&#8217;re looking again at ice time, then we&#8217;ve got a whole lot of variations of save percentage. You&#8217;re getting shots against, save percentage, expected save percentage, high danger save percentage, and goals saved above average. Folk&#8217;s&#8230; this might actually tell us who the statistically most average goaltenders are.</p>
<p>There winners are&#8230;</p>
<table width="247">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="119">Goaltender</td>
<td width="64">Avg</td>
<td width="64">Dif</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Curtis McElhinney</td>
<td>0.498</td>
<td>-0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Anthony Stolarz</td>
<td>0.508</td>
<td>0.008</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>C&#8217;mon&#8230; deep down you knew it was going to be McElhinney, right? I guess the rub here is that we&#8217;re looking at all goaltenders that played in the league last season without a minimum ice time attached to them, and it was bound to be a couple of backups. I&#8217;m going to adjust it for goaltenders with over 500 minutes so we have something more applicable.</p>
<table width="247">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="119">Goaltender</td>
<td width="64">Avg</td>
<td width="64">Dif</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Philipp Grubauer</td>
<td>0.497</td>
<td>-0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mackenzie Blackwood</td>
<td>0.492</td>
<td>-0.008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mikko Koskinen</td>
<td>0.510</td>
<td>0.010</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Honestly, I think I&#8217;m just as comfortable with the McElhinney and Stolarz results as with this group. Anyways, let&#8217;s look at the a potential roster</p>
<table width="222">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="79">LW</td>
<td width="79">C</td>
<td width="64">RW</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Galchenyuk</td>
<td>Turris</td>
<td>Pominville</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Raffl</td>
<td>Koivu</td>
<td>Kempe</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dubinsky</td>
<td>Lewis</td>
<td>Brown</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kahun</td>
<td>Glendening</td>
<td>Weise</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>Radil</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table width="222">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="79">LD</td>
<td width="79">RD</td>
<td width="64">G</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fowler</td>
<td>Vatanen</td>
<td>Grubauer</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oesterle</td>
<td>Ericsson</td>
<td>Koskinen</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Harpur</td>
<td>Ozhiganov</td>
<td>Wedgewood</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brown</td>
<td>Simek</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Yeah, there have been worse teams put together, but you should in no way be excited about any of this. It&#8217;s probably interesting that there&#8217;s no shortage of right shot defensemen on this team. It&#8217;s also likely this team can kill penalties. This team can make the playoffs, but you probably hope they don&#8217;t because who the hell would want to watch this group play?</p>
<h1>Isn&#8217;t this a Leafs blog?</h1>
<p>Fair enough. Here&#8217;s the breakdown of how the Leafs fared using my criteria which was used to find the most average player, not identify the best players. (<em>remember hits, blocked shots, and PIMs)</em></p>
<p><strong>Forwards</strong></p>
<table width="315">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="123">Player</td>
<td width="64">Team</td>
<td width="64">Position</td>
<td width="64">Overall</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Tavares</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.810</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Zach Hyman</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>L</td>
<td>0.803</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kasperi Kapanen</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>0.737</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mitchell Marner</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>0.705</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kenny Agostino</td>
<td>N.J</td>
<td>L</td>
<td>0.650</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alexander Kerfoot</td>
<td>COL</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.635</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Auston Matthews</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.633</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>William Nylander</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>0.595</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pontus Aberg</td>
<td>MIN</td>
<td>L</td>
<td>0.490</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jason Spezza</td>
<td>DAL</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.448</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Frederik Gauthier</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.435</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Trevor Moore</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>L</td>
<td>0.338</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nic Petan</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.293</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It&#8217;s time to catch Kenny Agostino fever. WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to state right now that I think Auston Matthews is better than him.</p>
<p><strong>Defense</strong></p>
<table width="225">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="106">Player</td>
<td width="35">Team</td>
<td width="84">Overall</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jake Muzzin</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>0.804</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tyson Barrie</td>
<td>COL</td>
<td>0.714</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cody Ceci</td>
<td>OTT</td>
<td>0.649</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Travis Dermott</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>0.642</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Morgan Rielly</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>0.629</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jake Gardiner</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>0.585</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ben Harpur</td>
<td>OTT</td>
<td>0.490</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kevin Gravel</td>
<td>EDM</td>
<td>0.360</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Martin Marincin</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>0.342</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Justin Holl</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>0.259</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I found a way to create decent looking numbers for Cody Ceci, I&#8217;ll take my Nobel Prize in Math now please.</p>
<p>Also at this point it still feels like it&#8217;s worth include Jake Gardiner on this list while the Leafs move mountains to bring him back.</p>
<p><strong>Goaltenders</strong></p>
<p>Freddie Andersen had the 5th highest score in the league at .781, and neither Hutchinson or Neuvirth played enough to make the cut.</p>
<h1>So&#8230;</h1>
<p>None of this really means anything. This wasn&#8217;t really about finding the true middle of the pack based on true predictors of talent or what helps a team win. This was six categories on three different position groups and averaging them out into seeing what average players look like. While there&#8217;s some value in considering all these categories in establishing a single number to judge all players by, I&#8217;m going out on a limb here to say that there should probably be heavier weighting attached to points over penalty minutes.</p>


The summer boredom is soon coming to an end and with that, the opportunity to drop in non-newsy posts about hockey is coming to an end as well. That probably serves you the readers well, but we're not quite there yet. Instead I give you an idea stolen from 538...
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Who is baseball's most average player? <a href="https://t.co/dfhCjtbm6Y">https://t.co/dfhCjtbm6Y</a></p>
— FiveThirtyEight (@FiveThirtyEight) <a href="https://twitter.com/FiveThirtyEight/status/1166463544969314306?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 27, 2019</a></blockquote>
Interesting, right?

Well, it's a bit easier to do that with baseball than it is to do with hockey, but screw it, I'm going to try anyways using 6 equally weighted measures for forwards, 6 equally weighted measures for defensemen, and ditto for the goaltenders. The end result, you guessed it, a completely average team.

<strong>The Forward Criteria</strong>

This isn't an attempt a truly profound analytical model. This is just some fun to have in late August, so that being said the categories are time on ice, points, expected goals for %, corsi for %, penalty minutes, and hits. I can sense a lot of you cringing and others shrugging in acceptance.

Here's where the title of the post becomes quite misleading. I'm not looking at averages, I'm looking at percentiles for each of these categories and then averaging them out. Annoyed yet? Sure you are. In reality only a select few of you are actually reading the methodology part, so I can put whatever I want in here. Banana fart sundae. See? No one is even going to acknowledge that.

Here are your forwards...
<table width="236">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="121">Player</td>
<td width="29">Pos</td>
<td width="39">Avg</td>
<td width="47">Dif</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mario Kempe</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>0.500</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Trevor Lewis</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.500</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mikko Koivu</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.500</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kyle Turris</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.502</td>
<td>0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Luke Glendening</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.502</td>
<td>0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brandon Dubinsky</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.498</td>
<td>-0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dale Weise</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>0.498</td>
<td>-0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alex Galchenyuk</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.497</td>
<td>-0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lukas Radil</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.497</td>
<td>-0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>J.T. Brown</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>0.495</td>
<td>-0.005</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Raffl</td>
<td>L</td>
<td>0.495</td>
<td>-0.005</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dominik Kahun</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.495</td>
<td>-0.005</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jason Pominville</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>0.507</td>
<td>0.007</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
This is the most Minnesota Wild team that ever Minnesota Wilded. Not just because of the number of current or former Wild players on it, but the fact that is absolutely a perpetual bubble team group. It's entirely possible that Turris and Galchenyuk are better than average, but using just 2018-19 numbers, this is how it shakes out.

<strong>The Defense Criteria</strong>

Well, it would be boring if I did it exactly the same as the forwards, so we'll switch it up and go with ice time, points, hits, penalties, blocked shots, and corsi against. I'm writing this before seeing the results, so I can tell you, I'm excited to see what this produces.
<table width="204">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="121">Player</td>
<td width="39">Avg</td>
<td width="44">Dif</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Igor Ozhiganov</td>
<td>0.501</td>
<td>0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Radim Simek</td>
<td>0.499</td>
<td>-0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Josh Brown</td>
<td>0.502</td>
<td>0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jordan Oesterle</td>
<td>0.503</td>
<td>0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sami Vatanen</td>
<td>0.510</td>
<td>0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ben Harpur</td>
<td>0.490</td>
<td>-0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cam Fowler</td>
<td>0.489</td>
<td>-0.011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jonathan Ericsson</td>
<td>0.483</td>
<td>-0.017</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
There's the Leafs content you expect to see on Leafs blog. While Ozhiganov may have moved on, using my hastily thrown together criteria he was the most average defenseman in the NHL last season. I'm not sure what witchcraft I cast to lump Vatanen and Fowler into this mix, but there will be no second guessing of this, and we will all accept that Ben Harpur is marginally better than Cam Fowler. After all, hits, PIMs, and blocked shots, dude.

<strong>The Goaltender Criteria</strong>

While I think it is important to acknowledge their voodoo, and the fact that pretty much every goaltender has the same stats, I'll proceed with the charade that is already producing what is a completely nonsensical lineup, that does in fact seem capable of being the 16th best team in the league.

For goaltenders we're looking again at ice time, then we've got a whole lot of variations of save percentage. You're getting shots against, save percentage, expected save percentage, high danger save percentage, and goals saved above average. Folk's... this might actually tell us who the statistically most average goaltenders are.

There winners are...
<table width="247">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="119">Goaltender</td>
<td width="64">Avg</td>
<td width="64">Dif</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Curtis McElhinney</td>
<td>0.498</td>
<td>-0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Anthony Stolarz</td>
<td>0.508</td>
<td>0.008</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
C'mon... deep down you knew it was going to be McElhinney, right? I guess the rub here is that we're looking at all goaltenders that played in the league last season without a minimum ice time attached to them, and it was bound to be a couple of backups. I'm going to adjust it for goaltenders with over 500 minutes so we have something more applicable.
<table width="247">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="119">Goaltender</td>
<td width="64">Avg</td>
<td width="64">Dif</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Philipp Grubauer</td>
<td>0.497</td>
<td>-0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mackenzie Blackwood</td>
<td>0.492</td>
<td>-0.008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mikko Koskinen</td>
<td>0.510</td>
<td>0.010</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Honestly, I think I'm just as comfortable with the McElhinney and Stolarz results as with this group. Anyways, let's look at the a potential roster
<table width="222">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="79">LW</td>
<td width="79">C</td>
<td width="64">RW</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Galchenyuk</td>
<td>Turris</td>
<td>Pominville</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Raffl</td>
<td>Koivu</td>
<td>Kempe</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dubinsky</td>
<td>Lewis</td>
<td>Brown</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kahun</td>
<td>Glendening</td>
<td>Weise</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>Radil</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table width="222">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="79">LD</td>
<td width="79">RD</td>
<td width="64">G</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fowler</td>
<td>Vatanen</td>
<td>Grubauer</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oesterle</td>
<td>Ericsson</td>
<td>Koskinen</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Harpur</td>
<td>Ozhiganov</td>
<td>Wedgewood</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brown</td>
<td>Simek</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Yeah, there have been worse teams put together, but you should in no way be excited about any of this. It's probably interesting that there's no shortage of right shot defensemen on this team. It's also likely this team can kill penalties. This team can make the playoffs, but you probably hope they don't because who the hell would want to watch this group play?
<h1>Isn't this a Leafs blog?</h1>
Fair enough. Here's the breakdown of how the Leafs fared using my criteria which was used to find the most average player, not identify the best players. (<em>remember hits, blocked shots, and PIMs)</em>

<strong>Forwards</strong>
<table width="315">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="123">Player</td>
<td width="64">Team</td>
<td width="64">Position</td>
<td width="64">Overall</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Tavares</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.810</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Zach Hyman</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>L</td>
<td>0.803</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kasperi Kapanen</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>0.737</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mitchell Marner</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>0.705</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kenny Agostino</td>
<td>N.J</td>
<td>L</td>
<td>0.650</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alexander Kerfoot</td>
<td>COL</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.635</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Auston Matthews</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.633</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>William Nylander</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>0.595</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pontus Aberg</td>
<td>MIN</td>
<td>L</td>
<td>0.490</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jason Spezza</td>
<td>DAL</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.448</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Frederik Gauthier</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.435</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Trevor Moore</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>L</td>
<td>0.338</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nic Petan</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>0.293</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
It's time to catch Kenny Agostino fever. WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

I'm going to state right now that I think Auston Matthews is better than him.

<strong>Defense</strong>
<table width="225">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="106">Player</td>
<td width="35">Team</td>
<td width="84">Overall</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jake Muzzin</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>0.804</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tyson Barrie</td>
<td>COL</td>
<td>0.714</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cody Ceci</td>
<td>OTT</td>
<td>0.649</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Travis Dermott</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>0.642</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Morgan Rielly</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>0.629</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jake Gardiner</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>0.585</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ben Harpur</td>
<td>OTT</td>
<td>0.490</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kevin Gravel</td>
<td>EDM</td>
<td>0.360</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Martin Marincin</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>0.342</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Justin Holl</td>
<td>TOR</td>
<td>0.259</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
I found a way to create decent looking numbers for Cody Ceci, I'll take my Nobel Prize in Math now please.

Also at this point it still feels like it's worth include Jake Gardiner on this list while the Leafs move mountains to bring him back.

<strong>Goaltenders</strong>

Freddie Andersen had the 5th highest score in the league at .781, and neither Hutchinson or Neuvirth played enough to make the cut.
<h1>So...</h1>
None of this really means anything. This wasn't really about finding the true middle of the pack based on true predictors of talent or what helps a team win. This was six categories on three different position groups and averaging them out into seeing what average players look like. While there's some value in considering all these categories in establishing a single number to judge all players by, I'm going out on a limb here to say that there should probably be heavier weighting attached to points over penalty minutes.

We built the most average team in hockey

Recent articles from Jon Steitzer

Breaking News